Back

Overground suspension walkers elicit more and higher quality stepping than treadmills: A longitudinal study of pre-walking infants with Down syndrome

Hospodar, C. M.; Enriques, F. A.; Paez, A. I.; Feldner, H. A.; Looper, J. E.; Kretch, K. S.

2026-05-12 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.64898/2026.05.05.26352150 medRxiv
Show abstract

ImportanceChildren with Down syndrome (DS), a genetic condition associated with neuromotor impairments, walk [~]1 year later than typically developing peers. Treadmill training is the most successful known intervention for accelerating walking onset in DS. Overground stepping with mobility devices better mimics critical properties of real-world walking, but it is unknown how overground stepping develops in pre-walking infants with DS. ObjectiveWe aimed to characterize the developmental trajectory of stepping quantity and quality in supported overground stepping compared to supported treadmill stepping. We also measured infants ability to self-propel in the walker. Finally, we assessed caregivers perspectives on both devices. DesignWe tested infants at 10, 13, 16, and/or 19 months of age. SettingThis study occurred in a university laboratory in the United States. ParticipantsWe tested 31 pre-walking infants with Down syndrome across 69 sessions. ExposureAt each session, infants completed four trials per task (treadmill and walker) and a test of self-propulsion in the walker. Main Outcomes and MeasuresWe measured step quantity (overall step rate and alternating step rate), step quality (percentage of steps that were alternating, forward, and flat-landing), the ability to self-propel the walker, and caregiver perspectives on both devices. ResultsStep quantity increased with age and varied by task--infants took more steps per minute in the walker compared to the treadmill. Moreover, steps were of equal or higher quality in the walker. By 16 months, about half of infants could self-propel. Caregivers viewed both devices favorably, though the majority preferred the walker for home and/or community use. ConclusionsOverground walkers promote more stepping than a treadmill in pre-walking infants with DS, with stepping of similar or higher quality. Caregivers feel positively about overground walkers. RelevanceOverground stepping using a suspension walker shows promise as an intervention for pre-walking infants with Down syndrome.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
19.7%
2
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.2%
4
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.0%
9
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
10
Gait & Posture
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
11
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
13
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
14
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
15
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
16
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
17
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
18
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Aging
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
22
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
23
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.7%
24
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
26
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%