Back

Assessing the Efficacy of Computational Workshops and Participatory Live Coding in Evolutionary Biology

Swiston, S. K.; Kuehne, L.; Moore, R.; Landis, M. J.

2026-05-06 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.05.04.722624 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Computational workshops are common in evolutionary biology and are used to share discipline-specific tools and skills with researchers. Despite the perceived importance of these workshops, there is no common set of criteria for workshop success, and there are few peer-reviewed studies investigating the efficacy of workshops or assessing the value of particular instructional techniques in this context. Here, we focused on one key element of a successful workshop: its ability to increase participants motivation to use the methods and tools presented during the workshop. We analyzed the goals, perceptions, and future plans of research practitioners engaging in a workshop on phylogenetic methods of historical biogeography using pre- and post-workshop surveys. Overall, the workshop was successful at motivating participants, and survey responses provided insights into participants perceptions of different activities, including "participatory live coding". Apart from this case study, we aim to highlight the importance of developing a common set of workshop goals in collaboration with other workshop stakeholders and the need for specialized, validated tools for assessing the efficacy of computational workshops for researchers.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.2%
2
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.3%
3
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
4
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.4%
5
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.4%
7
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
8
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.7%
9
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.9%
10
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 35%
2.1%
13
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
14
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
16
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.9%
18
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
20
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
61 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 47%
0.7%
25
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
26
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
28
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%