Back

A diagnostic plasma omics-biomarker for Alzheimer's disease informed by microglial single-cell transcriptomics: A pilot study

Lutz, M. W.; Man, Z.; Zheng, Y.; Venkatesan, S.; Chiba-Falek, O.

2026-05-05 genomics
10.64898/2026.04.30.721959 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe current biomarker framework for the diagnosis and staging of Alzheimers disease (AD) relies mainly on neuropathological features; thus, its performance for diagnosis is limited prior to the initiation of neurodegeneration. Here, we leveraged transcriptomic data to develop a new framework for omic-informed blood-based diagnostic biomarkers for AD from early-stage. MethodsMicroglial gene expression from single-nucleus (sn)RNA-seq data was analyzed via 6 statistical methods to identify candidate panels of genes predictive of AD. A total of 78 gene panels, 30-2000 genes in size, were selected and evaluated for their ability to distinguish AD patients from controls. Three top-ranked panels of 300, 50 and 30 genes were transferred to blood (monocyte) transcriptomic data obtained from living subjects via a graph-based mapping approach based on optimal transport statistics. ResultsThe 300-panel method resulted in an AUC of 0.7 and moderate accuracy (75%) in classifying AD; however, the accuracy in predicting cognitively normal patients was lower (53%). While the 300 genes provided high accuracy, inspection of the distribution of p values for the gene set revealed that the panel could be greatly reduced in size to capture the most significant differences between AD patients and cognitively normal individuals. The accuracy and specificity of the 50 and 30 panels demonstrated similar AUC values but improved the balance between the prediction of AD patients and normal controls. Specifically, the 50-gene panel resulted in an AUC of 0.7, with 65% AD accuracy and 71% normal accuracy. ConclusionsIntegrating multiomics datasets into the AD biomarker discovery pipeline offers a powerful modality to increase precision and comprehensiveness in AD research and clinical applications.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
23.3%
2
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
52 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
3
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.5%
4
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.2%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.2%
8
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
9
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
10
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
12
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
13
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
14
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Nature Aging
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
17
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
18
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
20
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
43 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
22
Molecular Neurodegeneration
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
23
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
25
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
26
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
Genetic Epidemiology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
28
FEBS Open Bio
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
29
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
30
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%