Back

Adolescent food insecurity impairs gut signal sensitivity and cue-induced appetitive behaviours in female rats

Livermore, A.; Ong, Z. Y.

2026-05-04 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.04.29.721762 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Unpredictable and insufficient access to food, known as food insecurity, is associated with the development of obesity. However, causal mechanisms underlying this paradoxical relationship remain poorly understood. Using a rat model of food insecurity, this study investigated whether food insecurity causes dysregulated feeding behaviours, specifically impaired gut signal sensitivity and enhanced cue-driven appetitive responses. Adolescent female rats were assigned to receive either ad libitum chow access (Food secure), 90% caloric restriction (Food restricted) or unpredictable quantity and timing of food access (Food insecure), for 4 weeks. After which, rats were returned to an ad libitum chow diet for the remainder of the study. To examine gut signal sensitivity, we measured the effects of cholecystokinin (CCK) on 10% sucrose intake. To examine cue-driven feeding behaviours, we used Pavlovian appetitive conditioning and measured appetitive responses towards a food-predictive cue. Results showed that prior food insecure rats were less sensitive to the intake inhibitory effects of CCK and exhibited enhanced cue-induced appetitive behaviours, when compared to food secure and food restricted groups. Anxiety-like behaviours or learning and memory was not different between groups. At the end of the study, adolescent caloric restriction resulted in reduced fat mass, plasma leptin levels and body weight when compared to food secure, but not food insecure rats, suggesting that adolescent food insecurity somewhat overcame these metabolic effects. Taken together, our findings suggest that adolescent food insecurity impaired gut signal sensitivity and heightened food cue sensitivity, which may cause enduring metabolic and behavioural adaptations that promote overeating and weight gain.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Physiology & Behavior
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.5%
2
Appetite
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
6
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
7
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
8
International Journal of Obesity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
9
Endocrinology
38 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
10
Obesity
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
11
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
12
Biology of Sex Differences
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
13
Alcohol
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
14
Hormones and Behavior
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
15
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
16
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
17
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
20
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.7%
22
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%
24
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%
25
Metabolism
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
26
Neuropharmacology
60 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%