Back

Machine Learning-Assisted Feature Selection Identifies the Joint Association of Body Mass Index and Periaortic Adipose Tissue as a Risk Factor for Aortic Dissection: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Wang, S.; Jia, H.; Yuan, P.; Ren, L.; Wu, M.; Zhang, H.; Qian, P.; Luo, H.; Luo, Y.; Guan, Z.; Hou, K.; Zhou, M.; Hu, C.; Xiong, J.; Wang, L.; Fu, W.

2026-05-01 surgery
10.64898/2026.04.29.26352087 medRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUNDAortic dissection (AD) is a life-threatening emergency with high mortality. Although elevated body mass index (BMI) is associated with both AD incidence and mortality, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Periaortic adipose tissue (PAAT) increases with BMI, and the PAAT of AD shows marked inflammatory infiltration, suggesting PAAT-driven inflammation may contribute to the development of AD. However, no direct evidence links BMI and PAAT to AD. To further elucidate the obesity-inflammation-AD relationship, we aim to quantify the contributions of BMI, PAAT, and their derived indices to the risk of AD. METHODSThis retrospective multicenter study (June-November 2025) quantified PAAT around the descending thoracic aorta with CT angiography (CTA). Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify AD risk factors. Based on the Boruta algorithm (a machine learning feature selection method) and ROC curve analysis, the variable importance for AD risk was assessed. The dose-response relationship between BMI-Volume-derived metric (BMV) and AD risk was further characterized by quartile stratification and restricted cubic spline (RCS). RESULTSThis study enrolled 376 consecutive participants. After adjusting for potential confounders, BMI, smoking, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diabetes mellitus (DM), TC/HDLC, ApoE, PAAT volume (Volume), PAAT fat attenuation index (FAI), and BMV were identified as independent predictors of AD. Volume was the strongest AD predictor with the highest Z-score. Compared with BMI [AUC 0.627, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.569-0.687] and Volume (AUC 0.716, 95% CI: 0.662-0.772), BMV showed better discriminatory performance (AUC 0.726, 95% CI: 0.673-0.778). RCS showed an approximately linear positive association between BMV and AD risk (P-overall < 0.001, P-non-linear = 0.09). CONCLUSIONSIn this retrospective multicenter study, BMV, a composite measure integrating systemic and periaortic adipose tissue factor, showed a positive association with AD risk, and improved predictive performance beyond BMI, indicating incremental predictive value, pending external validation. GRAPHIC ABSTRACTA graphic abstract is available for this article. WHAT IS KNOWNO_LIBody-mass index (BMI) appears to be associated with an increased risk of aortic dissection (AD) and higher all-cause mortality, but a definitive consensus remains elusive. C_LIO_LIPAAT has been identified as an independent cardiovascular risk factor, with marked inflammatory cell infiltration observed in the PAAT of PAAT has been identified as an independent cardiovascular risk factor, with marked inflammatory cell infiltration observed in the PAAT of aortic diseases patients. C_LIO_LIPAAT increases with BMI, and its pro-inflammatory function may destabilize the aortic wall, but relationship of BMI-PAAT synergy and AD remains to be demonstrated. C_LI WHAT THE STUDY ADDSO_LIBMI, PAAT volume, and its FAI were independent predictors of AD, with volume ranked as the strongest predictor by the Boruta algorithm. C_LIO_LIThe BMV, a composite metric that integrated systemic and periaortic adipose tissue factor, was positively associated with AD risk and improved predictive performance beyond BMI alone. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
12.3%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 6%
8.2%
4
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.7%
5
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.3%
6
European Heart Journal
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
7
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
9
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.7%
10
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.5%
11
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
12
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.2%
13
Atherosclerosis
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
14
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
15
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.0%
16
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
17
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
18
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
19
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
20
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
21
BMC Neurology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
22
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
24
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
25
Cardiovascular Research
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
26
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
28
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%