Back

Polygenic predisposition modifies the associations of fish oil supplementation with circulating omega-3 fatty acids: a cross-sectional gene-diet interaction study in UK Biobank

Xu, H.; Yu, G.; Lu, Y.; Fuller, H.; Song, S.; Shen, Y.; Chiang, C. W. K.; Darst, B. F.; Ye, K.

2026-04-30 nutrition
10.64898/2026.04.29.26352078 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSeveral genetic variants have been identified to modify the effects of fish oil supplementation (FOS) on increasing circulating omega-3 fatty acids, but it remains unexplored whether polygenic predisposition to low circulating omega-3 fatty acids modifies these effects. ObjectiveTo test if polygenic scores (PGS) for circulating omega-3 fatty acids modify the associations of FOS with corresponding circulating concentrations. MethodsWe developed PGS models for absolute circulating concentrations of total omega-3 fatty acids (Omega-3), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and their relative percentages in total fatty acids (Omega-3% and DHA%), using a multi-ethnic genome-wide association study (N=136,016). PGS models were validated in 437,803 UK Biobank participants of European (EUR), Central/South Asian (CSA), African, and East Asian genetic ancestries. Linear models tested PGS-by-FOS interactions on corresponding observed circulating concentrations. Discovery analysis was performed separately in 237,380 EUR participants and each non-EUR group. Replication analyses were performed using oily fish intake and in another 178,935 EUR participants. ResultsIn EUR participants, PGS explained 5.3-11.1% of the phenotypic variance, and significant PGS-by-FOS interactions were detected across all four circulating omega-3 traits. Among participants in the bottom 5% of the PGS distribution, FOS was significantly associated with a 0.40 SD (95% CI: 0.39-0.44) increase in Omega-3. This association effect was 11.1% larger than the population average ({beta} = 0.36; 95% CI: 0.35-0.37; PInt = 0.016) and 42.8% larger than that in participants in the top 5% of the PGS distribution ({beta} = 0.28 SD; 95% CI: 0.25-0.32; PInt = 4.03X10-10). These interaction patterns were consistently observed in CSA ancestry and confirmed in replication and sensitivity analyses. ConclusionsPGS modify the associations of FOS with circulating omega-3 fatty acids in EUR and CSA populations, with larger FOS effects in participants with lower PGS. These findings support the development of genome-informed precision nutrition.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.9%
2
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
The Journal of Nutrition
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.6%
6
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.2%
7
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
9
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
10
Food & Function
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
11
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.9%
13
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
14
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.5%
17
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
18
International Journal of Obesity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
19
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Obesity
19 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
Diabetes Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
22
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
23
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
Appetite
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%