Unraveling the Link Between Cognition and Motor Impairment and Activity After Stroke: A Longitudinal Study
Binyamin Netser, R.; Lorber Haddad, A.; Goldhamer, N.; Idan, H.; Tayer Yeshurun, A.; Meir, G.; Pollack, K.; Mizrahi, T.; Bar Haim, S.; Shmuelof, L.
Show abstract
BackgroundStroke leads to both motor and cognitive impairments that can substantially limit daily activities and independence. Although these impairments are often treated separately in rehabilitation, growing evidence suggests they are interconnected. Understanding how cognitive and motor impairments relate to one another is essential for developing more effective, integrated rehabilitation strategies. ObjectiveThis longitudinal study addressed three key questions: (1) Do motor and cognitive impairments co-occur after stroke? (2) Does cognitive ability influence motor recovery? (3) Are cognitive and motor recovery trajectories associated? MethodsWe followed 148 individuals in the subacute phase of stroke, assessing them at 1 and 3 months post-stroke. Cognitive function was measured using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the clock drawing test. Motor impairment was assessed using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) and grip strength. Activity was evaluated using the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), 10-Meter Walk Test (10MW), and Timed Up and Go (TUG). ResultsAt one month post-stroke, cognitive and motor impairment and activity levels were not correlated, although strong within-domain correlations were observed. Baseline cognitive ability did not predict motor impairment recovery. However, improvements in cognitive ability from 1 to 3 months were moderately correlated with gains in motor activity measures (r = 0.22-0.29, p < 0.05). ConclusionsAlthough cognitive and motor impairments may arise independently after stroke, their recovery processes appear partially linked. These findings underscore the importance of addressing both domains in rehabilitation and advancing understanding of shared mechanisms that support recovery across functional systems.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Impaired everyday executive functions and cognitive strategy use on the Weekly Calendar Planning Activity in individuals with stroke undergoing acute inpatient rehabilitation 96%
- Rasch validation of a new scale to measure dependency in arm use in daily life: the Upper Limb Lucerne ICF-based Multidisciplinary Observation Scale (UL-LIMOS) 95%
- Towards individualized Medicine in Stroke – the TiMeS project: protocol of longitudinal, multi-modal, multi-domain study in stroke 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Characterizing upper extremity motor behavior in the first week after stroke 96%
- Effects of bilateral and unilateral mental practice on actual motor performance and event-related desynchronization 94%
- Relationship between the rate of perceived stability, electrodermal activity and task performance during balance challenges in chronic stroke 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal trajectories of global and domain-specific cognition after stroke using the Oxford Cognitive Screen 94%
- When two communication differences intersect: Comparing inpatient rehabilitation care and outcomes for people with post-stroke aphasia who do and do not require an interpreter 94%
- Acute cortical stroke alters neural activity in the subthalamic nucleus, which correlates with motor disability in rats 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.