Back

Public health impact of better vehicle safety standards in Mexico

Mojarro, F. R.; Perez-Ferrer, C.; Muslim, H.; Arredondo, S. B.; Brodziak, S.; Avalos-Alvarez, S.; Izquierdo-Gutierrez, N.; Juarez-Rueda, A.; Barrientos-Gutierrez, T.; Antona-Makoshi, J.

2026-04-30 health policy
10.64898/2026.04.28.26351923 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundImplementing proven vehicle safety standards recommended by the UN World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations is among the most cost-effective strategies to reduce road traffic deaths. In 2022, Mexico approved updated vehicle safety standards, including side pole testing, electronic stability control, seatbelts, airbags, side structures, and anchorage child restraint systems. However, pedestrian protection and advanced driver-assistance technologies, such as autonomous emergency braking systems (AEBS), were excluded. These exclusions are critical, given that more than half of road traffic deaths involve vulnerable road users. Local evidence on the expected benefits of implementing comprehensive vehicle safety standards is needed to guide policy decision-making. ObjectiveTo estimate the potential public health impact of increasing the availability of recommended vehicle safety technologies in Mexico. MethodsWe conducted a comparative risk assessment analysis to estimate the impact of improving vehicle safety standards on road traffic deaths, injuries, and disability-adjusted life years. Counterfactual analyses were defined using traffic statistics for 2019 as baseline, relative risk estimates associated with each safety technology, and technology penetration within Mexicos vehicle fleet. Three scenarios were modeled: (1) full implementation of Mexicos 2022 standards; (2) addition of crashworthiness, AEBS, and motorcycle ABS/ESC; and (3) inclusion of expanded AEBS crash configurations, lane departure warning (LDW), and lane keeping assistance (LKA) systems. ResultsScenario 1 reduced deaths by 18%, injuries by 16%, and DALYs by 18%, with the greatest benefits for car occupants. Scenario 2 reduced deaths by 29%, injuries by 27%, and DALYs by 30%, benefiting motorcyclists and pedestrians the most. Scenario 3 reduced deaths, injuries, and DALYs by 41%, 38%, and 41%, respectively, benefiting car occupants and motorcyclists. ConclusionsCurrent vehicle safety standards in Mexico are expected to reduce deaths, injuries, and disabilities, yet existing guidelines focus largely on protecting car occupants. Mexico should strive to update and strengthen its current legislation by adding technologies that protect vulnerable road users, such as pedestrians and cyclists, and to focus on technologies for motorcycle users to further reduce the burden of road traffic injuries.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.0%
2
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.8%
3
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.5%
4
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
10
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
12
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
13
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
FACETS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
18
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
19
The Innovation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
20
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
21
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
22
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
23
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
24
COVID
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
International Journal of Drug Policy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%