Back

Frequency Mismatch Critically Limits Gamma Entrainment: A Kuramoto Model Study Supporting Personalized GENUS Therapy

Park, Y.; Han, J. W.; Kim, K. W.

2026-04-29 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.04.28.26351909 medRxiv
Show abstract

Gamma oscillations (30-100 Hz) are critical for cognitive processing, and their disruption is associated with Alzheimers disease (AD) and related dementias. Gamma ENtrainment Using Sensory Stimulation (GENUS) therapy applies 40 Hz light and/or sound to restore gamma oscillations, but clinical trials report highly variable responses. Using Kuramoto oscillator models calibrated to human neurophysiology, we demonstrate that frequency mismatch between stimulation frequency and individual intrinsic gamma frequency (IGF) is a critical determinant of entrainment efficacy. A 2 Hz frequency mismatch reduced phase-locking value (PLV) by 43-82%, depending on neural resonance bandwidth, with PLV at mismatch indistinguishable from the finite-sample noise floor -- indicating complete absence of stimulus-synchronized oscillation. In a simulated population with IGF drawn from a clinically realistic distribution (mean 35.10 {+/-} 3.49 Hz, N = 200), fixed 40 Hz stimulation achieved mean PLV of 0.119 {+/-} 0.081, compared to 0.504 {+/-} 0.009 for individualized frequency stimulation -- a 4.2-fold advantage (t(199) = 67.26, p < 0.001, Cohens d = 4.76). In the clinically relevant subgroup with IGF < 36 Hz (62% of the population), the fold advantage increased to 5.3x. Stochastic noise sensitivity analysis confirmed robustness of the fold advantage (3.8-4.0x across{sigma}{square}{square}{square}{square}{square}{square} = 0-2.0 rad/s; p < 10{square}3{superscript 1} at all levels). These findings provide quantitative computational support for personalized GENUS protocols incorporating individual gamma frequency measurement and carry direct implications for the design of next-generation clinical trials.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Brain Stimulation
125 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
50.1%
50% of probability mass above
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 4%
10.4%
3
Journal of Neurogenetics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.2%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.1%
6
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.6%
7
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
8
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
9
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
10
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
71 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
11
GeroScience
109 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
12
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.3%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.3%
14
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.0%
16
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
17
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
18
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
30 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
19
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.6%
20
Nature Neuroscience
252 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
21
Psychophysiology
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%