Back

Accurate detection of 3D pelvic-floor-muscle strength for reforming clinical diagnosis and treatment of women's pelvic floor dysfunction

Wang, T.; Li, N.; Wang, H.; Zhou, Y.; Yu, X.; Wang, Q.; Wei, D.; Lian, R.; Luo, Y.; Niu, X.

2026-04-29 obstetrics and gynecology
10.64898/2026.04.28.26351889 medRxiv
Show abstract

Accurate and comprehensive evaluation of three-dimensional (3D) pelvic-floor-muscle (PFM) strength distributions are highly expected to play a crucial role in clinical early diagnosis and physiotherapy precise treatment of womens pelvic-floor-dysfunction (PFD). However, clinically existing PFM-evaluating methods merely assess a rough and synthetical PFM strength from the whole vagina muscle tunnel, seriously restricting the development of PFD-related diagnostic methodologies and therapeutic interventions. Here, 3D complex female PFM-strength distributions have been accurately detected by developing a portable multi-channel PFM-pressure dynamic measuring system. Clinical trials demonstrate the superiority in high PFM-strength sensitivity and 3D spatial resolution, offering the opportunities to imply specific deficits in personalized PFM functions and customized interventions accordingly. Significantly, various subclinical PFM abnormalities can be identified by the 3D accurate PFM-strength distributions, which is not possible using traditional PFM-evaluating methods, providing a visual biomechanical foundation for clinical early diagnosis and physiotherapy precise treatment of PFD. Combined with the additional advance in physical comfortability, patients-friendliness universality, and stability without motion artifact achieved by the novel designed vaginal probe, this proof of concept research holds the promise for paradigm revolution in PFM pathological research, and promotes the transformation of clinical pelvic-floor medicine from empirical medicine to data-driven precision medicine.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
14.7%
2
Journal of Advanced Research
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.2%
4
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.4%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.4%
6
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.3%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.9%
9
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
10
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.7%
13
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
14
Cell Reports Physical Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
16
Small Methods
26 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
17
National Science Review
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
20
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
23
Science China Life Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Light: Science & Applications
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
26
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%