Back

Navigating HPV Vaccination Challenges in Low-Resource Settings: Practical Strategies for Estimating the Size of Out-of-School Girls

Park, S.; Rosser, E.; Zhang, L.; Wysong, M. D.; Majidulla, A.; Terada, M.; Surkan, P. J.; Rosen, J. G.; Limaye, R. J.

2026-04-29 public and global health
10.64898/2026.04.28.26351102 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAchieving the 2030 target of 90% human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination coverage among girls by age 15 requires effectively reaching out-of-school (OOS) girls, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where most vaccine delivery occurs in school settings. This study explored how diverse countries define OOS girls and strategies for estimating the size of this population. MethodsBetween May and September 2024, we conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews with 32 HPV vaccine program stakeholders across six African and Asian LMICs with established HPV vaccination programs: Cambodia, Cameroon, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique, and Uganda. Using hybrid inductive-deductive thematic analyses, we examined how countries taxonomize OOS girls as well as current practices for enumerating or estimating population sizes. ResultsCountries commonly defined OOS girls as those not enrolled in schools under the Ministry of Educations purview, but in practice, this definition varied across contexts. National-level data (e.g., census, school enrollment rates) and household-level approaches (e.g., headcounts) were commonly used to enumerate in-school and OOS girls. However, the distinction between in-school and OOS girls was often blurred during HPV vaccination implementation and evaluation, limiting the operational utility of these methods. To address these challenges, some countries adopted alternative approaches, including proxy-based population estimates using historical or approximate data and the prioritization or areas perceived to have a higher presence of OOS girls. These alternative approaches were perceived as pragmatic compromises between accuracy, feasibility, and resource constraints. ConclusionAccurate enumeration of OOS girls is important for HPV vaccination but may not be feasible in resource-limited settings. Pragmatic, context-specific estimation methods can offer a feasible way to identify and reach OOS girls more effectively with HPV vaccination services.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
14.8%
2
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.5%
4
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.4%
5
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.4%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.9%
7
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Vaccine: X
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
9
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
10
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
12
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
Tropical Medicine & International Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
17
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.2%
18
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
20
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
21
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
22
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
23
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
24
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%
25
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.5%
26
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
27
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
28
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
29
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
30
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%