Back

Comparative analysis of simplified and standard protocols for managing moderate and severe acute malnutrition in outpatient services in Venezuela: a prospective cohort study

Hernandez, P.; Mata, C.; Lares, M.; Moran, M.; Gonzalez, Z.; Catarino, E.; Ramos, Y.; Varela, A.; Fautsch-Macias, Y.; Funnell, G.

2026-04-29 nutrition
10.64898/2026.04.27.26351902 medRxiv
Show abstract

To provide adequate care to children with acute malnutrition, different management protocols have been in use, including the WHO standard guideline and a simplified protocol. The latter, used in Venezuela since 2020, has adopted three simplifications: 1) Expanded criteria for treatment admission; 2) Use of a single treatment product; 3) Simplified dosage: use of 2 sachets per day to treat SAM cases and 1 sachet per day to address MAM cases, regardless of weight. Our study compares the effectiveness, length of stay and programmatic costs of the simplified protocol and the WHO standard guideline in addressing acute malnutrition in children aged 6-59 months in Venezuela from February to August 2024. A total 229 children were enrolled in a prospective cohort study. Monitoring was continuous up to 16 weeks of treatment, evaluating key indicators including weight gain, recovery time, survival, recovery and default rates, number of sachets of RUTF consumed and implementation costs. Baseline characteristics were similar between cohorts, with most cases being moderate in both the standard (90.9%) and simplified (86.6%) cohorts. Both protocols demonstrated similar anthropometric improvements and recovery trajectories throughout follow-up, with no significant differences (p > 0.05). However, the simplified protocol showed higher recovery rates overall for MAM and SAM (70.1% vs 59.4%, p=0.031), although default rates remained high in both protocols (24.8% in the standard protocol vs. 18.7% in the simplified protocol). The simplified protocol presented reduced costs by 15% ($133 vs $157 per recovered child). These results suggest that the simplified protocol, using a single product and an adapted dosage, is as effective as the standard protocol for treating children with acute malnutrition in Venezuela. The findings support wider implementation of the simplified protocol particularly in resource-limited settings. Further research is needed to optimize protocols and improve adherence to reduce default rates.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
21.9%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
17.0%
3
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
4
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
6
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
7
The Journal of Nutrition
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
10
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
11
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
12
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.6%
14
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
15
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
16
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
17
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
18
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
19
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
20
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
22
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
23
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
24
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%