Back

Lactoferrin and lysozyme for Kenyan children presenting with wasting and diarrhea: A 2 x 2 factorial randomized controlled trial

Tickell, K. D.; Tiwari, R.; Trehan, I.; Otieno, J.; Okello, M.; Shah, A.; Keter, L.; Yoshioka, E.; Ochola, E.; Nyabinda, C.; Rwigi, D.; Njunge, J. M.; Houpt, E.; Platts-Mills, J. A.; Liu, J.; Richardson, B. A.; McGrath, C. J.; Means, A. R.; Diakhate, M. M.; Stewart, G. J.; Walson, J. L.; Singa, B. O.; Pavlinac, P. B.

2026-04-28 public and global health
10.64898/2026.04.27.26351844 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionLactoferrin and lysozyme are milk derived proteins with antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties. We tested if these supplements improved time-to-nutritional-recovery and reduced the incidence of new moderate or severe diarrhea (MSD) among children presenting to hospital with wasting and diarrhea. MethodsMedically-stable children aged 6-24 months with diarrhea and wasting were randomized to a 16-week course of lactoferrin, lysozyme, a combination of both, or placebo. Time-to-nutritional-recovery (mid-upper arm circumference [≥] 12.5cm) and incidence of new onset MSD were the primary outcomes observed over 6-months follow-up. Subgroup analyses included efficacy by wasting status (severe vs. moderate), stunting, age, inpatient/outpatient, and adherence. ResultsAmong the 600 children randomized, 531 (88.5%) nutritionally recovered within 16-weeks; 63% among severely wasted children and 95% in children with moderate wasting. The wasting recovery rate in the combination arm was non significantly higher (HR: 1.23, 95%CI: 0.97, 1.57; p=0.083) than the placebo group. Children randomized to lactoferrin alone and lysozyme alone had nutritional recovery rates similar to placebo (HR: 0.94, 95% CI 0.74, 1.20; p=0.607 and HR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.71, 1.17; p=0.462, respectively). Among severely wasted children, the combination arm had a higher recovery rate than placebo (HR: 2.76, 95% CI 1.49, 5.09; p=0.001), but not the individual lactoferrin (HR: 1.29, 95% CI 0.69, 2.41; p=0.427) and lysozyme (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.40, 1.60; p=0.530) arms. Children randomized to intervention arms had comparable incidence of MSD (82.3-97.0 per 100 child-years) to the placebo arm (75.3 per 100 child-years). ConclusionsThe combination of lactoferrin and lysozyme for 16 weeks modestly improved nutritional recovery time particularly among severely wasted children. If confirmed, there may be a role for enteric-targeted therapeutics as adjuvants to severe wasting management. Additional strategies are needed for the post-acute diarrhea recovery period.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.1%
3
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.1%
4
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
5
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.4%
6
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.8%
8
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
9
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
10
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
12
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
15
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
16
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
17
Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
18
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
20
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
21
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 76%
0.7%
23
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
24
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.6%
26
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
27
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
28
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%