Back

Adherence to the Eatwell Guide and associations with markers of physical function: A prospective analysis within the UK Biobank cohort

Griffiths, A.; Gregory, S.; Malcomson, F. C.; Cronin, K.; Matu, J.; Ells, L.; Shannon, O. M.

2026-04-28 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.04.27.26351814 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe Eatwell Guide represents the UKs principal healthy eating model and understanding whether adherence to UK dietary recommendations can attenuate age-related functional decline is essential to inform healthy ageing strategies. MethodsIn up to 157,457 participants from the UK Biobank, we explored cross-sectional and prospective associations between adherence to the Eatwell Guide and markers of physical function (grip strength, fat-free mass percentage, self-reported walking pace, and falls). Eatwell Guide adherence scores were derived from 24-hour dietary recall data (Oxford WebQ), and quantified using a graded, food-based scoring system. Differences between population subgroups including by age, sex, physical activity, and protein intake level were explored. ResultsHigher Eatwell Guide adherence was cross-sectionally associated with higher grip strength, greater fat-free mass percentage, higher odds of brisk walking pace, and lower odds of falls (all p<0.001). Prospectively, greater adherence was associated with attenuated fat-free mass decline ({beta}=0.02, SE=0.001, p<0.001) and slower grip strength decline ({beta}=0.01, SE=0.002, p<0.01). Higher adherence was also prospectively associated with greater odds of brisk walking pace (OR=1.02, 95% CI: 1.017-1.021, p<0.01), though this advantage attenuated over follow-up (EWG*Time: OR=0.998, 95% CI: 0.997-0.999, p=0.002). Higher adherence was prospectively associated with lower falls risk (OR=0.996, 95% CI: 0.995-0.998, p<0.001), with this protective association remaining stable over time (EWG*Time: p=0.89). ConclusionsHigher Eatwell Guide adherence was associated with preserved muscle mass, modest attenuation of grip strength decline over time, and a reduced risk of falls, supporting its relevance for musculoskeletal health and physical function in ageing populations.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.7%
3
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 32%
5.0%
5
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
6
European Journal of Epidemiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.1%
9
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
11
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.7%
14
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
Experimental Gerontology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
16
International Journal of Obesity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
17
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
19
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
20
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.7%
24
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 47%
0.7%
26
Nature Aging
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
28
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
29
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
30
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%