Back

Reference Values for Epicardial Adipose Tissue: Data from 27,500 CT scans in the General Population and Symptomatic Patients

Molnar, D. E.; Wang, C.; Maaniitty, T.; Björnson, E.; Adiels, M.; Carlhäll, C.-J.; Jernberg, T.; Kullberg, J.; Ostenfeld, E.; Söderberg, S.; Saraste, A.; Knuuti, J.; Bergström, G.

2026-04-27 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.04.24.26351713 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Increased epicardial adipose tissue volume (EATV) is a potentially important risk marker for coronary artery disease (CAD) available from cardiac computed tomography (CT) images. Sex-differences and effects of age and body size on EATV have been insufficiently explored, and no reliable reference values exist. Consequently, EATV has yet to find its deserved use in clinical practice. Objectives: To define normal values by sex and age, the best normalization procedure for EATV to neutralize effects of body-size, explore the relationship between normalized EATV and cardiac risk, and propose a clinically meaningful cut-off. Methods: AI-based automated EATV data from the general population (n=25,155) and a clinical cohort (n=2,482) with suspected CAD was normalized to height, BSA and heart volumes. Correlation between EATV and EAT attenuation was tested with Spearman?s rank correlation and linear regression to find the optimal normalization. Normalized EATV was compared to high-risk by SCORE2 and obstructive CAD in the population cohort. A cut-off including 95% of cases with obstructive CAD was defined in the general population and tested in the clinical cohort. Results: EATV varied with sex and age across cohorts. Normalization of EATV to total heart volume (EATVh) was superior by all metrics and neutralized the effects of sex. High-risk by SCORE2 and the prevalence of obstructive CAD increased over quartiles of EATVh in the population cohort, and significantly higher EATVh was seen with obstructive CAD in both cohorts. A cut-off of 0.1 in EATVh had a negative predictive value for obstructive CAD of 97.1% in the general population and 88.9% in the clinical cohort. Conclusions: EATV varies considerably with sex, age and body size. Normalization to heart volume outperformed other procedures, and EATVh is a useful marker of obstructive CAD in both the general population and symptomatic patients.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.3%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.5%
4
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.9%
5
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
8
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.8%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.8%
10
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
14
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
15
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
16
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
17
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
18
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
19
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
Metabolism
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
27
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
29
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.7%
30
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%