Back

Feature-Based Parametric Response Mapping on Thoracic Computed Tomography for Robust Disease Classification in COPD

Namvar, A.; Shan, B.; Hoff, B.; Labaki, W. W.; Murray, S.; Bell, A. J.; Galban, S.; Kazerooni, E. A.; Martinez, F. J.; Hatt, C. R.; Han, M. K.; Galban, C. J.; Ram, S.

2026-04-27 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.04.24.26351675 medRxiv
Show abstract

Purpose: To develop an interpretable feature-based Deep Parametric Response Mapping (PRMD) method that combines wavelet scattering convolution networks and machine learning to spatially detect and quantify functional small airways disease (fSAD) and emphysema on paired inspiratory-expiratory CT scans, with enhanced noise robustness. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective analysis of prospectively acquired data (2007-2017), we developed and validated a deep learning-based PRM approach using paired CT scans from 8,972 tobacco-exposed COPDGene participants ([&ge;]10 pack-years; mean age 60.1 {+/-} 8.8 years; 46.5% women), including controls with normal spirometry (n = 3,872; controls), PRISm (n = 1,089), GOLD 1-4 COPD (n = 4,011). Data were stratified into training, validation, and testing sets (24:6:70). PRMD extracts translation-invariant image features using a wavelet scattering network and applies a subspace learning classifier to classify voxels as emphysema or non-emphysematous air trapping (fSAD). PRMD was compared with conventional density-based PRM for voxel-wise agreement, correlation with pulmonary function, robustness to noise, and sensitivity to misregistration using Pearson correlation, Bland-Altman analysis, and paired t tests. Results: PRMD achieved 95% voxel-wise agreement with standard PRM (r = 0.98) while demonstrating significantly greater robustness under noise. PRMD showed stronger correlations with FEV1; (emphysema: r = - 0.54; fSAD: r = - 0.51; P < 0.0001) than standard PRM (r = - 0.42 for both; P < 0.0001). Under simulated high-noise conditions, standard PRM overestimated disease by ~15%, whereas PRMD limited error to < 5% (P < 0.001). Conclusion: PRMD provides an interpretable, feature-driven and noise-resilient alternative to traditional PRM for emphysema and fSAD classification, enhancing the reliability of CT-based COPD phenotyping for multi-center studies and low-dose imaging applications.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.7%
2
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.7%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
4
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
5
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
6
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
9
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
10
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
11
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
12
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.8%
15
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
17
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
19
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
20
Photoacoustics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
21
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
26
SLAS Technology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
27
Respiratory Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
28
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
29
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
30
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%