Back

Feature-Based Parametric Response Mapping on Thoracic Computed Tomography for Robust Disease Classification in COPD

Namvar, A.; Shan, B.; Hoff, B.; Labaki, W. W.; Murray, S.; Bell, A. J.; Galban, S.; Kazerooni, E. A.; Martinez, F. J.; Hatt, C. R.; Han, M. K.; Galban, C. J.; Ram, S.

2026-04-27 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.04.24.26351675 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeTo develop an interpretable feature-based Deep Parametric Response Mapping (PRMD) method that combines wavelet scattering convolution networks and machine learning to spatially detect and quantify functional small airways disease (fSAD) and emphysema on paired inspiratory-expiratory CT scans, with enhanced noise robustness. Materials and MethodsIn this retrospective analysis of prospectively acquired data (2007-2017), we developed and validated a deep learning-based PRM approach using paired CT scans from 8,972 tobacco-exposed COPDGene participants ([&ge;]10 pack-years; mean age 60.1 {+/-} 8.8 years; 46.5% women), including controls with normal spirometry (n = 3,872; controls), PRISm (n = 1,089), GOLD 1-4 COPD (n = 4,011). Data were stratified into training, validation, and testing sets (24:6:70). PRMD extracts translation-invariant image features using a wavelet scattering network and applies a subspace learning classifier to classify voxels as emphysema or non-emphysematous air trapping (fSAD). PRMD was compared with conventional density-based PRM for voxel-wise agreement, correlation with pulmonary function, robustness to noise, and sensitivity to misregistration using Pearson correlation, Bland-Altman analysis, and paired t tests. ResultsPRMD achieved 95% voxel-wise agreement with standard PRM (r = 0.98) while demonstrating significantly greater robustness under noise. PRMD showed stronger correlations with FEV (emphysema: r = -0.54; fSAD: r = -0.51; P < 0.0001) than standard PRM (r = -0.42 for both; P < 0.0001). Under simulated high-noise conditions, standard PRM overestimated disease by [~]15%, whereas PRMD limited error to < 5% (P < 0.001). ConclusionPRMD provides an interpretable, feature-driven and noise-resilient alternative to traditional PRM for emphysema and fSAD classification, enhancing the reliability of CT-based COPD phenotyping for multi-center studies and low-dose imaging applications. Key PointsO_LIThis study introduces combined wavelet scattering and subspace learning for medical image segmentation, enabling accurate, interpretable voxel-level classification of emphysema and functional small airways disease on paired CT scans. C_LIO_LIThe proposed Deep Parametric Response Mapping method demonstrated 95% voxel-wise agreement with standard Parametric Response Mapping and stronger correlations with spirometric measures, enhancing the clinical relevance of CT-based phenotyping for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. C_LIO_LIDeep Parametric Response Mapping significantly improved robustness to image noise--reducing overestimation of emphysema and functional small airways disease from [~]15% to <5% (P < 0.001)--and benefits from reduced data requirements due to the fixed, mathematically defined filters used in wavelet scattering. C_LI Summary StatementDeep Parametric Response Mapping improves the accuracy and noise robustness of CT-based classification of emphysema and functional small airways disease using feature-based representations, enhancing the reliability of COPD phenotyping.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.1%
2
European Radiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.2%
3
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 28%
5.6%
5
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.6%
6
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.4%
7
Physics in Medicine & Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
9
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
10
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
11
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.7%
12
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.2%
13
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
14
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
16
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
17
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
18
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
19
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
20
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
22
Photoacoustics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
23
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
102 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.9%
26
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
27
SLAS Technology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
28
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
29
Rheumatology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
30
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%