Back

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) for Protein-Ligand Interaction Prediction

Khilar, S.; Natarajan, E.

2026-04-24 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.04.23.720519 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Predicting protein-ligand interactions in the modern drug discovery has revolved from the involvement of artificial intelligence and structural bioinformatics using Graph Neural Networks (GNNs). The limited explainability of GNN models presents an important encumbrance in biomedical research, but it has achieved a high degree of accuracy in determining and identifying binding affinity and active compounds, as evidenced by [1] [2] [3] [4]. Here this research focuses on the interpretation of protein-ligand interactions at a molecular level, a rapidly developing area within Graph Neural Networks (GNNs). Now days modern study handling techniques such as visualization techniques, attention mechanism and model-based feature ascription by model to boost, and make robust and decrease false predictions on binding. Along with some approaches include like graph pooling strategies, message-passing optimization, self-supervised learning, transfer learning and contrastive learning are rapidly utilized to enhance the representative learnings. Furthermore, integration of molecular docking simulations, hybrid deep learning architectures and protein language model gives more reliable & biological predictions of protein-ligand interactions. That focuses on given process that identifies key ligand atoms and binding residues, as well as physicochemical factors influencing affinity, through chemical thought processes. Here this research work identified the challenges of developing biologically significant explanations, transparency, and the corollary dataset biases on interpretability. The research work conducted an in-depth investigation into the consolidation of protein language models to establish more reliable pathways for future research, examining hybrid architectures, transparent and energy-efficient GNNs, and scientifically grounded AI models for drug discovery. My research work highlights that XGNNs establishes a connection between Deep Learning and Biochemical expertise with increased confidence, which will enhance the accuracy of predictive models and computational models.

Matching journals

The top 15 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.9%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
3
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.9%
4
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
5
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
6
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
7
Molecules
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
8
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
9
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
10
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
11
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
BioSystems
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
13
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
14
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
50% of probability mass above
16
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
18
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
19
Computational Biology and Chemistry
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
20
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
21
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
22
Journal of Biosciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
23
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
24
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
25
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
26
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
27
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
28
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Journal of Computational Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
30
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%