Back

Mucus transcriptional profiling as a minimally invasive approach to identify thermal stress in a stenothermal salmonid

Lazaro-Cote, A.; Durhack, T.; Kissinger, B. C.; Mochnacz, N. J.; Jeffries, K.

2026-04-27 genomics
10.64898/2026.04.23.720280 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Global climate change has increased the frequency and severity of stressful temperatures that freshwater fishes experience, necessitating rapid and sensitive methods to monitor wild populations. Tissues used to measure transcriptional responses traditionally involved invasive or lethal sampling, which may be undesirable for imperilled species. Epidermal mucus offers a non-lethal and minimally invasive alternative, but whether thermal thresholds can be detected in mucus to identify fish experiencing thermal stress is unclear. Bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) are a legally protected salmonid and cold-water specialist, generally occupying waters 12 {degrees}C and below, with higher temperatures resulting in cellular stress. Therefore, we measured a suite of 56 genes using high-throughput qPCR to compare machine learning classifiers developed with transcriptional profiles of epidermal mucus, gill, liver, and muscle to classify laboratory reared juvenile bull trout as below (9 {degrees}C, 12 {degrees}C) or above (15 {degrees}C, 18 {degrees}C) cellular thermal thresholds. Mucus profiles most resembled gills but represented an intermediate transcriptional response to all tissues. A reduced biomarker panel of 10 genes in mucus assigned fish to stress categories with 94.1% (95% CI = 71.3-99.9%) accuracy, which was comparable to gill (100.0%, CI = 82.4- 100%), liver (95.0%, CI = 75.1-99.9%), and muscle (100.0%, CI = 80.5-100.0%). Sex-specific temperature effects were evident in all tissues, but less pronounced in mucus and gill than in liver and muscle. Our findings demonstrate that transcriptional profiling of mucus can reliably identify individuals experiencing thermal stress, highlighting the promise of this non-lethal approach for monitoring at-risk species.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.2%
3
Aquaculture
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.5%
5
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
6
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
7
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
9
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
10
Environmental DNA
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
11
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.3%
12
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
13
Physiological Genomics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
14
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Journal of Fish Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
18
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
22
Hydrobiologia
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
24
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
25
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
26
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%
27
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
28
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.5%
29
International Journal of Food Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%