Back

Drivers and barriers to the implementation of the school feeding values-based food procurement guidelines and ultra-processed food restrictions

Fernandes Davies, V.; Perrut, I.; Thow, A.-M.; Duran, A. C.

2026-04-24 health policy
10.64898/2026.04.22.26351508 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective: To investigate in the National School Feeding Program (PNAE) the local level drivers and barriers to the implementation of four guidelines: the banning of sugary drinks; restrictions on the procurement of processed and ultra-processed foods; the mandatory increase in weekly servings of fruits and vegetables offered to students; and mandatory direct procurement from family farmers. Design: Qualitative study that used semi-structured interviews. Street level bureaucracy theory informed the theoretical framework and thematic analysis. Setting: Brazilian municipalities, across the country five geographic regions (North, Northeast, Southeast, South, and Midwest). Participants: Stakeholders (e.g. nutritionists, school cooks, and food procurement managers) involved in the local implementation of the PNAE program across the country. Results: Ninety stakeholders were interviewed. Stakeholders reported having autonomy to perform their activities, collaboration and support from other members within the local government and food providers, adequate infrastructure such as a well-equipped kitchens, the availability of trained personnel, and political commitment as drivers for optimum program implementation. Reported barriers included lack of support and resistance to change among cooks, teachers and parents; insufficient physical and human resources; and limited political commitment. When barriers outweighed drivers, interviewees reported adapting their practices, often in restrictive ways that could compromise the implementation of the program. Conclusions: Drivers and barriers to local PNAE implementation were generally similar across studied municipalities, although their magnitude varied. In contexts of greater economic vulnerability and fiscal constraint, additional support and targeted actions from the federal government may be required to strengthen local implementation

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 3%
28.4%
2
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.0%
3
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
5
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
6
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
7
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
8
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
9
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.9%
11
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
12
The Journal of Nutrition
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
14
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
15
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
16
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
17
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
19
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
22
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
23
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
27
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
28
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%