Back

Liver Biomarker Improves AHA/ACC 10-year ASCVD Risk Prediction in US and China Cohorts with ML

Peng, T.; Liu, C. l.

2026-04-23 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.04.22.26351466 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction: Accurate stratification of hard atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk remains challenging despite advances in prevention. Liver function biomarkers (LFBs), particularly gamma - glutamyl transferase (GGT), have been linked to cardiovascular outcomes, yet their contribution to hard ASCVD risk prediction is not well defined. Methods: This study analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 2005 - 2018) to assess cross - sectional associations between LFBs and 10 - year hard ASCVD risk estimated by the ACC/AHA Pooled Cohort Equations. Multivariable regression, restricted cubic splines, and mediation analyses were applied to examine independent and dose - response relationships. External validation was performed in the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) and NHANES using machine learning models (CoxBoost, Naive Bayes and Random Forest). Results: Among 5,731 NHANES participants, GGT showed an independent linear association with hard ASCVD risk (P - trend = 0.003), partly mediated by systolic blood pressure (44.8%), HbA1c (19.0%), and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (13.4%). Machine learning (ML) models incorporating GGT, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and globulin alongside traditional risk factors improved predictive accuracy, with Naive Bayes achieving an AUC of 0.751 in NHANES validation. Conclusions: GGT is an independent and biologically plausible biomarker of hard ASCVD risk, acting through cardiometabolic pathways. Incorporating LFBs into risk prediction models, particularly with machine learning, enhances risk stratification and may facilitate early identification of high - risk individuals.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.0%
2
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.9%
3
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.6%
4
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.5%
5
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 28%
4.2%
7
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.2%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.7%
9
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
10
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
11
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
12
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
14
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
15
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
16
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
17
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
18
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
19
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
21
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%
22
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
23
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%