Back

C26 and CT26 colorectal cancer models exhibit divergent cachexia phenotypes, intramuscular inflammation, and protein turnover signaling

Lu, X.; Tlais, H.; Rehman, H.; Martens, A. N.; Hartz, A. L.; Figueiredo, V. C.; Markworth, J. F.

2026-04-24 physiology
10.64898/2026.04.21.719997 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) cachexia induces skeletal muscle dysfunction, impeding quality of life and worsening cancer prognosis. Multiple preclinical models, including the widely used mouse model of subcutaneous inoculation with the C26 colorectal carcinoma cell line, have been developed to study the biological mechanisms of CRC cachexia and elucidate potential new treatments. It has been proposed that a distinct cell line of the same origin, namely CT26, is relatively non-cachexic. However, studies evaluating the relative potential of C26 and CT26 cells to induce cancer cachexia in parallel have been limited. The differences in the biological mechanisms by which C26 and CT26 impact skeletal muscle mass and function have also not been fully elucidated. In the current study, we investigated the differential capacity of C26 and CT26 to induce cancer cachexia using both an in vitro cancer-muscle cell co-culture and an in vivo syngeneic mouse model. Our results show that both C26 and CT26 cells induced significant atrophy of murine C2C12 skeletal myotubes. In the mouse model, while C26 and CT26 both reduced skeletal muscle mass and fat mass, only C26 tumors led to loss of body weight and impaired skeletal muscle force output. We further show that C26 tumor-bearing mice exhibit greater muscle inflammation than CT26 tumor-bearing mice. In addition, mice bearing C26 and CT26 tumors showed differential regulation of the innate immune responses and muscle protein turnover. Overall, our data suggests that although both C26 and CT26 cells do exhibit cachexic effects, C26 cells induce greater loss in body weight, fat mass, skeletal muscle mass, and physical function via promoting chronic inflammation and deregulating protein balance of skeletal muscle.

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Death Discovery
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
2
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 22%
4.9%
4
Journal of Cellular Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.4%
6
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.2%
7
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
8
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
9
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 33%
2.4%
11
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.1%
12
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
13
FEBS Open Bio
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
50% of probability mass above
14
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
16
Acta Physiologica
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
18
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
19
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
20
Biochimie
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
21
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
22
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.9%
23
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
26
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
27
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Life Sciences
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
30
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%