Back

Spatial profiling of CAR protein organization reveals in vivo remodeling during CAR-T therapy

Kashima, Y.; Makishima, K.; van Ooijen, H.; Franzen, L.; Petkov, S.; Nishikii, H.; Zenkoh, J.; Suzuki, A.; Branting, A.; Sakata-Yanagimoto, M.; Suzuki, Y.

2026-04-22 genomics
10.64898/2026.04.20.719384 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy utilizes genetically engineered patient-derived T cells to target cancer cells. Despite its clinical successes in multiple cancer types, the underlying molecular mechanisms by which molecules on CAR-T cells and surrounding cells interact with other proteins and collectively determine treatment efficacy remain elusive. Most previous studies have relied on transcriptome profiling, which does not fully reflect protein-level organization and interactions. In this study, we developed an antibody-oligonucleotide conjugate targeting the FMC63 region of CAR and integrated it into molecular pixelation (MPX). This approach enabled profiling of the dynamics of CAR molecules on cell surfaces as well as their colocalization with other proteins at the single-cell level. By applying MPX to longitudinal samples from three patients undergoing CAR-T cell therapy, we characterized the dynamic changes in CAR-associated protein organization in both pre-infusion CAR products and post-infusion peripheral blood. While CAR protein abundance and polarization showed limited variation across clinical courses, remodeling of a CAR-centered co-localization network was observed over time, including different retentions of specific molecular associations between patients with different clinical outcomes. Although derived from a limited cohort, our study identifies insights from this methodological framework beyond those gained by conventional omics analyses and offers results of a systematic investigation to predict and enhance CAR therapeutic outcomes. Key pointsO_LIMolecular pixelation was applied for chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) profiling at single-molecule and single-cell resolutions. C_LIO_LIProtein and transcriptome analyses of the CAR molecule showed dynamic remodeling during CAR-T therapy in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.6%
2
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.9%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
4
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.9%
5
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
6
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.3%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.1%
9
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.6%
10
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
11
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
12
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
13
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
50% of probability mass above
14
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
15
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
17
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
19
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
20
Theranostics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
21
Journal of Hematology & Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
22
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.4%
23
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
24
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
25
Antibody Therapeutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
26
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
27
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.8%
28
Small Methods
26 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
29
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
30
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%