Participant engagement and feedback in microbiome projects: a case of AWI-Gen 2

Returning individualized microbiome results in ways that are ethical, comprehensible, and useful remains under-explored in African settings. We nested a multi-site, mixed-methods study within the AWI-Gen Wave 2 gut microbiome sub-study of 1,801 women aged 42 to 86 years to engage the participants and provide feedback. All (1,001) participants from Agincourt and Soweto (South Africa) and Nairobi (Kenya) were invited to feedback meetings: 496 from Agincourt, 87 from Soweto, and 195 from Nairobi responded. Engagement strategies were tailored by site (small-group and home-based sessions, visual metaphors, Foldscopes, and local-language delivery). Using semi-structured discussions and structured observations analysed thematically in MAXQDA under COREQ, five cross-cutting themes emerged: (1) understanding of microbiome reports, (2) emotional responses to feedback, (3) perceived health relevance, (4) trust in research institutions, and (5) suggestions for improving engagement. Culturally grounded explanations and local-language facilitation enhanced comprehension and perceived relevance; English-heavy sessions were associated with more confusion. Most participants expressed satisfaction and described planned or enacted dietary and lifestyle changes, while frustration centred on long delays between sampling and feedback. Trust increased with transparency and individualized return of results but was often conditional on minimizing burdensome procedures such as repeat blood sampling (phlebotomy) and ensuring timely feedback. Engagement was feasible and low-cost (approximately USD 29-59 per participant) with site-specific resource needs. Limitations included constrained generalizability beyond the three study sites. Returning individualized microbiome findings in community settings in Africa is acceptable, feasible, and can motivate health-promoting behaviours when delivered promptly and in culturally and linguistically appropriate ways.