Back

Gut Microbiome as a Diagnostic Biomarker for Early Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 18 Studies across Five Cancer Types

TALL, M. l.

2026-04-22 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.04.19.719461 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe gut microbiome has emerged as a promising non-invasive biomarker for early cancer detection. However, evidence remains fragmented across individual studies with limited cross-cancer comparisons. ObjectivesTo systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of gut microbiome-based signatures across five major cancer types: colorectal cancer (CRC), gastric cancer (GC), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and lung cancer (LC). MethodsWe conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science (January 2000 - April 2026), following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies reporting area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for microbiome-based cancer classification were included. Pooled AUC estimates were derived using a DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). ResultsEighteen studies (2,587 participants) met inclusion criteria. Pooled AUC values were: CRC 0.785 (95%CI 0.750-0.819; I2=30.6%), GC 0.834 (0.781-0.887; I2=56.6%), PDAC 0.853 (0.785-0.921; I2=60.8%), HCC 0.809 (0.747-0.871; I2=70.3%), and LC 0.780 (0.738-0.822; I2=25.0%). Fusobacterium nucleatum was consistently enriched across CRC, GC, and PDAC, while Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Akkermansia muciniphila were depleted in all five cancer types. Porphyromonas gingivalis showed the highest fold-change in PDAC (log{blacksquare}FC=+2.8). Risk of bias was moderate-to-high in all studies. ConclusionsGut microbiome profiling demonstrates good-to-excellent diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.78-0.85) across five major cancer types. Shared cross-cancer biomarkers suggest common dysbiotic mechanisms amenable to pan-cancer screening. These findings support integration of microbiome signatures into multi-modal cancer detection platforms.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
9.2%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.4%
4
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
6
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
7
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
8
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
9
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
10
Gut Microbes
70 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
11
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.6%
12
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
13
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
15
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
16
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
17
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
18
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
19
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
20
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
21
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
22
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
23
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
24
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
Nature Aging
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Gut
36 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
27
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
41 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
29
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%
30
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.6%