Back

PSoup: an R package for simulating biological networks from a qualitative perspective

Fortuna, N. Z.; Lawson, B. A. J.; Mitsanis, C.; Burrage, K.; Beveridge, C. A.

2026-04-22 plant biology
10.64898/2026.04.19.719106 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mathematical modelling is essential for understanding how complex biological systems respond to genetic, physiological, and environmental changes. Existing approaches, however, often require trade-offs between mechanistic detail, model size, parameter uncertainty, and interpretability. Ordinary differential equation (ODE) models capture biochemical processes with quantitative precision but can demand extensive parameterisation. In contrast, large statistical and machine-learning models rely on substantial datasets and frequently lack mechanistic transparency. Qualitative approaches such as Boolean networks improve scalability but may oversimplify biological behaviour. To address some of these limitations, we present PSoup, an R package that automatically converts knowledge graphs into transparent, parameter-free, qualitative models. PSoup uses algebraic update rules designed around a fixed, biologically interpretable baseline, enabling predictions of relative change across diverse perturbations without requiring kinetic parameters. This design allows PSoup to integrate information across biological scales and from heterogeneous experimental sources. We evaluated PSoup using the well-studied shoot branching network of Bertheloot et al. (2019), which incorporates hormonal (auxin, strigolactone, cytokinin) and metabolic (sucrose) regulation. Across 78 experimental conditions, PSoup correctly predicted 88.5% of perturbation outcomes, including 89.5% accuracy for unique, biologically consistent comparisons. We further demonstrate how PSoup can distinguish among alternative plausible network topologies, revealing how structural differences influence emergent system behaviour. PSoup offers an intuitive, accessible, and mathematically transparent framework for exploring biological networks. Its capacity to integrate diverse knowledge and test alternative hypotheses positions it as a powerful tool for biological discovery and a valuable complement to existing modelling approaches.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
23.1%
2
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.3%
3
in silico Plants
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
4
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.0%
5
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
7
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.3%
8
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 25%
2.7%
10
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.9%
12
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 41%
1.7%
14
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.4%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.4%
16
Theoretical Ecology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
17
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Quantitative Plant Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
20
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
21
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
24
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
25
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
Journal of Computational Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
27
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
29
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%
30
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%