Stakeholder-engagement on assessment of implementation considerations for food-policy interventions for prevention of overweight and obesity in Kenya and evaluation of the engagement process

IntroductionIncreasing global prevalence of overweight and obesity underscores the need for context-specific evidence to guide preventive policy implementation. Previous modelling showed that promoting healthy indigenous foods, implementing a 20% tax on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), and introducing mandatory kilojoule menu labelling in formal-sector restaurants in Kenya were health-promoting, cost-saving, and cost-effective. Cost-effectiveness evidence is strengthened when considered alongside broader policy implementation considerations. We engaged stakeholders to assess additional implementation considerations relevant to decision-makers and to evaluate the stakeholder engagement process used in the modelling study. MethodsUsing the Assessing Cost-Effectiveness approach, we conducted a stakeholder-engaged study with national-level Kenya stakeholders recruited through purposive and snowball sampling. Through deliberative dialogue at a hybrid workshop, stakeholders assessed implementation considerations such as equity, feasibility and sustainability using a colour-coded scoring tool. We evaluated the engagement process using an anonymous survey covering seven stakeholder-engaged research domains. We analysed responses thematically. ResultsAcross the three interventions, most implementation considerations for feasibility, reach and impact, affordability, acceptability, and sustainability were assessed as medium or high. Industry acceptability of kilojoule labelling and SSB tax and affordability of kilojoule labelling to industry were rated low. Equity scores varied. Stakeholders proposed complementary measures that could raise low ratings to favorable scores. Clarity on stakeholder roles was identified as a key strength of the engagement process, while competing time commitments limited participation. ConclusionStakeholder insights contextualise prior cost-effectiveness evidence within policy-relevant implementation considerations and inform current fiscal and regulatory debates. Evaluation of the stakeholder engagement process underscores its contribution to strengthening public health research.