Back

Hemodynamic phenotypes linked to high-altitude subclinical organ damage

Chao, H.; Bao, G.; Wang, X.; Tang, B.; Wang, Q.; Hu, Y.; Avolio, A. P.; Zuo, J.

2026-04-21 physiology
10.64898/2026.04.17.719322 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundChronic exposure to high-altitude hypoxia imposes sustained cardiovascular stress, yet hemodynamic adaptation among healthy high-altitude dwellers is heterogeneous and remains poorly characterized. This study aimed to identify distinct hemodynamic phenotypes in a healthy high-altitude population using unsupervised machine learning and to evaluate their association with multi-system subclinical target organ damage. MethodsThis cross-sectional study enrolled 694 healthy adults permanently residing at [&ge;]3300 m on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Unsupervised K-means clustering was performed on nine hemodynamic variables, including peripheral and central blood pressures, augmentation index (AIx), pulse pressure amplification ratio (pPP/cPP), and systolic pressure amplification (pSBP-cSBP). Differences across phenotypes in carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), left ventricular mass index (LVMI), and pulse wave velocity (PWV) were assessed using one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni-corrected post-hoc tests. ResultsThree distinct hemodynamic phenotypes were successfully identified. The C2 (Balanced Adaptation) phenotype (n = 245) demonstrated the most favorable hemodynamic profile, characterized by the lowest blood pressure and augmentation index (AIx) values, along with the highest peripheral-to-central pulse pressure ratio (pPP/cPP). The C1 (Vascular Stress) phenotype (n = 267) presented with normal peripheral systolic blood pressure (125.9 {+/-} 11.3 mmHg) but exhibited markedly elevated wave reflection indices, including the highest heart rate-adjusted augmentation index (AIx@HR75: 31.9 {+/-} 9.7%) and the lowest pPP/cPP ratio (1.29 {+/-} 0.08). The C3 (High-Load Decompensation) phenotype (n = 182) displayed significantly elevated blood pressures and the greatest overall hemodynamic load. Regarding target organ damage, a clear gradient was observed across the three phenotypes. The C3 phenotype showed the highest carotid intima-media thickness (IMT: 1.162 {+/-} 0.23 mm) and left ventricular mass index (LVMI: 69.18 {+/-} 40.73 g/m{superscript 2}). Conversely, the C2 phenotype exhibited the highest estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR: 97.38 {+/-} 16.38 mL/min/1.73m{superscript 2}) and the lowest IMT (0.994 {+/-} 0.26 mm). The C1 phenotype consistently displayed intermediate values for all organ damage indicators. After Bonferroni correction, all pairwise comparisons for LVMI and pulse wave velocity (PWV) reached statistical significance (all P < 0.05). ConclusionsHealthy high-altitude individuals manifest three distinct hemodynamic phenotypes arrayed along a cardiovascular risk continuum. The novel Vascular Stress (C1) phenotype represents a "masked" high-risk state characterized by normal peripheral blood pressure but elevated arterial stiffness and wave reflection, challenging sole reliance on brachial pressure for risk assessment. This phenotype-based stratification provides a framework for precision prevention and early intervention in high-altitude populations.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
17.3%
2
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
7.1%
5
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
7
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
8
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
9
Function
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
10
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
11
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
12
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
13
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
14
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
16
Hypertension
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
17
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
npj Microgravity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
19
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
20
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
21
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
22
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
24
Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%