Back

Oropouche, Dengue, and Chikungunya differential diagnosis. Development and validation of predictive models with surveillance data from Espirito Santo-Brazil.

Nickel Valerio, E. C.; Coli Seidel, G. M.; Da Silva Nunes, R.; Alvarenga Americano do Brasil, P. E.

2026-04-25 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.04.17.26350875 medRxiv
Show abstract

There is an ongoing Oropouche Fever (OF) outbreak in Brazil since 2024. There are dengue and chikungunya prediction models available, but none to help discriminate dengue, chikungunya, and OF. Objective: This study aims to develop and validate clinical prediction models for dengue, chikungunya, OF. Methods: This study uses surveillance data from Espirito Santo state / Brazil, from 2023-2025. Epidemiological investigations and biological samples were used to conclude cases as either (a) clinical-epidemiologically confirmed, (b) laboratory confirmed, or (c) discarded. The predictors were all data related to signs, symptoms, and comorbidities available in the notification forms. The analysis was performed using random forest regression models, one for each outcome, in development and validation datasets. Results: A total of 465,280 observations were analyzed, 261,691 dengue cases (56.6%), 18,676 chikungunya cases (4.0%), 12,174 OF cases (2.6%), and 179,115 discarded cases (38.6%). All three models had good discrimination and moderate to good calibration after scaling prediction. The models retained from 26 to 16 predictors each. Leukopenia and vomiting were the most discriminatory predictors for dengue, arthritis, arthralgia, and rash were the most discriminatory for chikungunya, and epidemiological features were the most relevant for OF. The dengue, chikungunya, and OF models had ROC AUC of 0.726, 0.851, and 0.896 in the validation set, respectively. Conclusion: This research identified predictors most discriminative between dengue, chikungunya, and OF. We developed and validated predictive models, one for each condition, with moderate to very good performance available at https://pedrobrasil.shinyapps.io/INDWELL/. One may use them in diagnostic work-up and arbovirus surveillance.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
44.8%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
3
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.6%
4
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.3%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.9%
6
Acta Tropica
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
7
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
8
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
9
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
10
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
11
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
12
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
13
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
14
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
15
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
16
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
17
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
18
Journal of Infection and Public Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
19
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
20
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
21
Infection, Genetics and Evolution
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Tropical Medicine & International Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
23
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
24
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%