Age-specific income losses due to HPV-attributable cancers in Singapore
Blythe, R.; Graves, N.; Iyer, N. G.; Peres, M. A.
Show abstract
IntroductionThe link between Human Papillomavirus (HPV) and cancer is well-established. In Singapore, bivalent HPV vaccines are subsidised for females, but not males. Economic analysis of HPV vaccination has generally assessed the costs to the health system, but this may not be as relevant to individual decision-making as potential lost income. We estimated the impact of bivalent HPV 16/18 vaccination on sick leave, unemployment, and premature mortality as a function of age and sex to understand the broader impact of HPV-related cancers. MethodsWe developed a population-level economic model to estimate lifetime income losses by diagnosis age, sex and cancer type. We applied sex- and cancer-specific Cox regressions to the Singapore Cancer Registry for annual predicted survival from 1992 to 2022. These were combined with census and employment data to estimate HPV-associated income losses in Singapore. Attributable fractions and vaccine effectiveness data for HPV 16/18 from the literature were used to estimate the effectiveness of bivalent HPV vaccination. Structural sensitivity analysis examined the role of 80% population coverage conferring herd immunity. ResultsThe registry contained 17,294 individuals with an HPV-associated cancer diagnosis. Lost income was greatest for cervical cancer due to its high prevalence, however the losses per diagnosis were highest for oropharyngeal cancer. Bivalent HPV vaccination led to income benefits of $SGD1,397 [$895 to $1,838] in girls and -$62 [- $76 to -$48] in boys. A gender-neutral HPV vaccination of 80% of 15-year-old Singaporeans, conferring herd immunity, would have lifetime income protective benefits of $24.4m [$14.2m, $33.7m] per cohort, a five-fold return on investment. ConclusionsIn addition to avoiding healthcare costs and lost quality of life, parents should consider vaccination as a means of avoiding potential income losses. A national policy of gender-neutral HPV vaccination could deliver substantial income protection due to both individual vaccine protection and herd immunity.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cost-effectiveness of risk-stratified screening for cervical cancer in cohorts vaccinated against human papillomavirus with moderate vaccination coverage 93%
- Predicted long-term impact of COVID-19 pandemic-related care delays on cancer incidence and mortality in Canada 92%
- Inequalities in relative cancer survival by race, immigration status, income, and education for 22 cancer sites in Canada, a cohort study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The potential economic impact of the updated COVID-19 mRNA fall 2023 vaccines in Japan 93%
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Australian patients with solid organ cancers 93%
- COVID-19 vaccine uptake and effectiveness by time since vaccination in the Western Cape province, South Africa: An observational cohort study during 2020-2022 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A modelled analysis of the impact of COVID-19-related disruptions to HPV vaccination analysis 96%
- Building resilient cervical cancer prevention through gender-neutral HPV vaccination 93%
- The impact of COVID-19 on population cancer screening programs in Australia: modelled evaluations for breast, bowel and cervical cancer 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of the updated COVID-19 mRNA Autumn 2023 vaccines in Germany 93%
- The Potential Clinical Impact of Implementing Different COVID-19 Boosters in Fall 2022 in the United States 92%
- Modeling the Cost-Effectiveness of the COVID-19 mRNA-1273 vaccine in the United States 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 vaccines and evidence-based medicine 91%
- An economic evaluation of two self-sampling strategies for HPV primary cervical cancer screening compared with clinician-collected sampling 91%
- The prevalence, incidence and longevity of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 among primary healthcare providers in Belgium: a prospective cohort study with 12 months of follow-up 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.