Back

Differences in Cardiovascular Disease Burden, Screening, Education, and Care by Clinic Type in the 2022 Health Center Patient Survey

King, B.; Beech, B.; Jones, O.; Castillo, E.; Attri, S.; Buck, D. S.

2026-04-16 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2026.04.14.26350912 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPersons experiencing homelessness (PEH) have a 2-3-fold greater risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality compared with domiciled counterparts. Evidence has repeatedly shown elevated chronic disease burden, reduced access to many types of care, and lower utilization of medication to control CVD risk factors in clinical settings dedicated to providing health care to PEH. There are federally funded health clinics targeting barriers to access for patient populations experiencing homelessness in place. These clinics are frequently overwhelmed and limited by their scope to primary care despite well documented burdens of co- and tri-morbid conditions. There is scarce evidence on differences between access, quality, and experiences of care delivered relative to other safety-net models. MethodThe 2022 Health Center Patient Survey (HCPS) was collected on behalf of the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). The HCPS is a nationally representative, three-staged, sample-based survey collected via 1:1 interview with clinic patients. The survey assessed sociodemographics, health conditions and behaviors, access to and utilization of care, and patients experiences with comprehensive services they received at HRSA-funded Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), including community health centers (CHC), healthcare for the homeless (HCH) clinics, and public housing primary care (PHPC) clinics. One hundred and three unique awardees and 318 health center sites were recruited, and 4,414 patient interviews were completed. Investigators analyzed patient characteristics and multiple survey items related to AHAs Essential 8 metrics for differences between HCH and CHC patient responses. ResultsHCH clinics had fewer elderly patients ([~]7%) than CHCs ([~]17%). Reported 7-day physical activity measures, average sleep below 7 hours per day, and Lifetime smoking (>100 cigarettes; OR=4.2, p<0.001) were all greatest among HCH patients. Fewer HCH patients reported ever having or recent lipid tests (both p<0.001). HCH patients were more likely to report hypertension (p=0.003) but less likely to report receiving nutrition advice (all p<0.05). HCH patients were less likely to be taking medication even if it was prescribed (p<0.001). Adjustments for differences in age or CVD history were able to explain some observed differences but increased the magnitude of other disparities. ConclusionsCVD burden differs across the various HRSA funding mechanisms for clinics, as do demographics and multiple metrics of health behaviors and biomarkers of cardiovascular health. Greater disease burden in HCH patients is likely compounded by increased risk factors and underperformance in providing health education interventions. Clinical PerspectiveO_ST_ABSWhat Is New?C_ST_ABSO_LIPatients accessing Health Care for the Homeless clinics demonstrate unique cardiovascular risk profiles characterized by higher rates of inadequate sleep, smoking history, and pre-diabetes compared to Community Health Center patients, even after adjusting for sociodemographic factors. C_LI What Are the Clinical Implications?O_LITraditional cardiovascular disease risk assessment tools and prevention strategies may need to be recalibrated for homeless populations, as standard clinical metrics and screening approaches may not fully capture the complex interplay of behavioral, environmental, and social exposures affecting this vulnerable group. C_LI Research PerspectiveO_ST_ABSWhat New Question Does This Study Raise?C_ST_ABSO_LIHow do structural inequities and comorbid conditions resulting in and from homelessness impact health in ways that may not be captured by conventional risk assessment tools? C_LI What Question Should be Addressed Next?O_LIWhat modifications to evidence-based cardiovascular interventions are needed to effectively serve people experiencing homelessness, and how can these interventions be integrated into Health Care for the Homeless clinics and other FQHCs? C_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.7%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.4%
3
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
4
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
5
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
7
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
8
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
9
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
10
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
11
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
14
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
15
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
16
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
17
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
19
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.7%
21
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
22
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
23
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
24
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%