Back

Hidden risk in normal myocardial perfusion scans: AI-detected proximal coronary calcium on CT attenuation maps improves prognosis

Zhou, J.; Miller, R. J.; Shanbhag, A.; Killekar, A.; Han, D.; Patel, K. K.; Pieszko, K.; Yi, J.; Urs, M. K.; Ramirez, G.; Lemley, M.; Kavanagh, P. B.; Liang, J. X.; Kamagate, A.; Builoff, V.; Einstein, A. J.; Feher, A.; Miller, E. J.; Sinusas, A. J.; Ruddy, T. D.; Knight, S.; Le, V. T.; Mason, S.; Chareonthaitawee, P.; Wopperer, S.; Alexanderson, E.; Carvajal-Juarez, I.; Rosamond, T. L.; Slipczuk, L.; Travin, M. I.; Packard, R. R.; Acampa, W.; Al-Mallah, M.; deKemp, R. A.; Buechel, R. R.; Berman, D. S.; Dey, D.; Di Carli, M. F.; Slomka, P. J.

2026-04-15 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.04.14.26350808 medRxiv
Show abstract

Purpose: Spatial distribution of coronary artery calcium (CAC) may provide additional prognostic value in patients undergoing SPECT and PET myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). We aimed to automatically identify CAC in proximal segments from attenuation correction CT (CTAC) scans using artificial intelligence (AI) and to evaluate prognostic significance in two large international multicenter registries. Methods: From hybrid MPI/CT imaging (N=43,099) across 15 sites, we included 4,552 most relevant patients with 1) no prior coronary artery disease; 2) AI-derived mild CAC scores (1-99); and 3) normal perfusion (stress total perfusion deficit <5%). The independent associations between AI-identified proximal CAC and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality (ACM) were evaluated using multivariable Cox regression, likelihood ratio test (LRT), and continuous net reclassification index (NRI). Results: Among the patients with mild CAC and normal perfusion (mean age 65{+/-}12 years, 51% male), 1,730 (38%) had proximal CAC. Over 3.6 (inter-quartile interval 2.1, 5.2) years follow up, 599 (13%) and 444 (10%) patients had MACE or ACM, respectively. Proximal CAC was associated with an increased risk of MACE (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.24, 95% CI 1.03-1.48, P=0.02) and ACM (adjusted HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.01-1.53, P=0.04) after the adjustment of CAC score and density, clinical risk factors, and perfusion deficit. Proximal CAC improved the risk stratification of MACE (LRT P=0.02; NRI 12%) and ACM (LRT P=0.04; NRI 12%). Conclusion: In patients with mild CAC and normal perfusion, AI detection of proximal CAC identified a higher-risk group for adverse outcomes, highlighting its prognostic utility.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
2
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
3
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
4
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.4%
5
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
6
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 25%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
9
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.9%
10
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
12
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
13
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
15
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
16
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
17
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
18
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
19
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
20
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.8%
22
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
25
SLAS Technology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
27
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
28
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
30
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%