Back

Hippocampal-to-Ventricle Ratio as a Head-Size-IndependentBiomarker: Sex Differences and Cognitive Associations in 27,680UK Biobank Participants

Fernandez-Lozano, S.; Collins, D. L.

2026-04-15 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.13.718285 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Hippocampal volume is a key biomarker for Alzheimers disease and brain aging, yet reported sex differences vary substantially depending on head-size adjustment methods. We examined whether the hippocampal-to-ventricle ratio (HVR), a self-normalizing measure, provides more consistent sex difference estimates than conventional adjustment approaches. Using a subset of UK Biobank structural MRI data (N = 27,680; 56% female; ages 45-82), we compared sex differences across four adjustment methods (unadjusted, proportions, stereotaxic, residualized) and in samples matched on age and on intracranial volume (ICV). Hippocampal sex differences reversed direction across methods, ranging from d = -0.89 (males larger, unadjusted) to d = 0.58 (females larger, proportions), with a range of 1.5 standard deviations across analytical choices. In contrast, HVR showed a consistent female advantage (d = 0.52) that persisted in the ICV-matched subsample (d = 0.19), confirming this effect is not a head-size artifact. Males exhibited steeper cross-sectional age-related HVR differences (1.7x female rate, p < 10-50), consistent with males showing ventricular expansion at younger ages. Structural equation modeling revealed that HVR predicted general cognition comparably to hippocampal volume ({beta} = 0.04, overlapping CIs), and unlike residualized hippocampal volume, HVR maintained significant brain-cognition associations in both sexes. We provide sex-specific normative centile curves for clinical application. These findings indicate that apparent hippocampal sex differences largely reflect methodological choices rather than biology, while HVR captures consistent morphological variation related to brain aging that may have clinical utility.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.1%
2
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
12.1%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.3%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.7%
5
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.3%
6
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
npj Aging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
8
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
9
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
10
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 28%
2.1%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.9%
13
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
15
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
16
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
18
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
19
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
21
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
22
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.2%
23
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.8%
26
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Communications Psychology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%