Back

Are Nutritional Aspects And Body Composition Associated With The Can Do, Do Do Concept In People With COPD In Latin America? An Observational Study

Borges, P.; Freire, A. P. F.; Pedroso, M. A.; Spolador de Alencar Silva, B.; Lima, F. F.; Uzeloto, J. S.; Gobbo, L. A.; Grigoletto, I.; Cipulo Ramos, E. M.

2026-04-15 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.64898/2026.04.13.26350788 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionIndividuals with COPD can be classified according to their levels of physical activity (PA) and physical capacity (PC). The relationship between nutrition and body composition within these classifications remains unclear. ObjectivesTo compare the body composition and food intake of people with COPD and verify the associations. MethodsCross-sectional exploratory analysis study in which body composition and food intake were assessed in individuals with COPD. Classification was based on six-minute walk test (PC) and accelerometry(PA): Quadrant "can do, dont do" (I-preserved PC, low PA); quadrant "can do, do do" (II-preserved PC, preserved PA). Results72 individuals with COPD, 39 in quadrant I and 33 in quadrant II, with mean ages of (69 {+/-} 6) (67 {+/-} 7), respectively. Group I had a higher proportion of males, whereas group II had a higher proportion of females. A positive trend in skeletal muscle mass (p=0.011) (B= 2.883) and a negative trend in basal metabolic rate (p=0.010) (B=-0.092) for group I. ConclusionBrazilians with COPD classified in quadrants I and II showed similar results in terms of body composition and food intake. A positive trend in skeletal muscle mass was observed for the group I. These findings align with the pathophysiological model of COPD, in which the preservation of muscle mass and adequate protein intake support functional capacity and the maintenance of higher physical activity levels.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.