Back

Non-invasive Neuromodulation Targeting Approach by Mapping Stimulations and Lesions That Modify Visual Memory

Kwon, S.; Lee, S.; Siegel, J. S.; Chiulli, N.; Freedberg, M. V.; Hebscher, M.; Hendrikse, J. J.; Hermiller, M. S.; Ji, G.-J.; Tambini, A.; Ye, E.; Cohen-Zimerman, S.; Corbetta, M.; Grafman, J.; Voss, J. L.; Siddiqi, S. H.

2026-04-14 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.10.717784 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Therapeutic brain stimulation is believed to target specific networks, but targeting approaches for memory remain debated. For other symptoms, neuromodulation targets have been localized by mapping connectivity of lesions and stimulation sites to specific symptoms. This approach has yielded networks for global memory, but it remains unclear whether it applies to specific types of memory. Here, we mapped connectivity of stimulation sites, lesions, and atrophy patterns associated with different memory types. We included 544 individuals across three datasets: transcranial magnetic stimulation (N=262), penetrating head trauma (N=169), and ischemic stroke (N=113). We identified a network preferentially connected to lesions and stimulation sites specifically associated with changes in visual memory. Of note, the direction of this effect was inverted depending on whether lesions or stimulation occurred at younger age or an older age, consistent with prior results. This age effect was replicated in an independent dataset of patients with preclinical Alzheimers disease (N=1240). To examine neuromodulation targets, we computed electrical field models for potential TMS sites that overlap with the networks derived from each stimulation or lesion dataset; the resulting targets intersected with established targets that demonstrated efficacy for treating memory impairment - precuneus, cortical-hippocampal network, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex - with peak intersection at medial posterior parietal lobe, angular gyrus, and left anterior middle frontal gyrus, respectively. Future head-to-head clinical trials are needed to systematically compare these proposed neuromodulation targets against each other. One Sentence SummaryNeuromodulation targets for visual memory diverge by age at the time of injury or stimulation.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.1%
2
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
10.1%
3
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.1%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 21%
9.1%
5
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.4%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 21%
4.2%
7
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 24%
2.7%
9
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
10
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
12
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
13
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
15
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
19
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.2%
21
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
27
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
29
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%