Back

Gut Microbiota Mediates the Association between Diet Quality and Ectopic Adiposity: The Multiethnic Cohort Adiposity Phenotype Study

Wang, S.; Hullar, M. A. J.; Curtis, K. R.; Kwee, S.; Park, S.-Y.; Rettenmeier, C.; Monroe, K. R.; Ernst, T.; Shepard, J.; Wilkens, L. R.; Le Marchand, L.; Lampe, J. W.; Lim, U.; Randolph, T. W.

2026-04-10 microbiology
10.64898/2026.04.10.717245 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundHigher-quality diets have been associated with lower levels of ectopic fat deposited in the viscera and liver, which is hypothesized to be mediated in part by the gut microbiota. ObjectivesWe tested this hypothesis in a multi-ethnic imaging study using global (microbiome-wide) testing as well as a high-dimensional multiple-mediators regression framework to identify bacterial genera in the human gut that mediate the association between diet quality and ectopic adiposity. MethodsWe analyzed the cross-sectional data of 1,400 older adults (age 60-77) from five racial/ethnic groups in the Multiethnic Cohort Adiposity Phenotype Study (2013-2016). Overall diet quality was defined by adherence to the MIND diet. The relative abundance of 151 bacterial genera was quantified from 16S rRNA gene sequencing of the stool samples. Visceral fat, liver fat, and the presence of MASLD (metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease) were determined based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We used high-dimensional mediation analysis (HDMA) to estimate gut microbial mediation in the linear regression of visceral fat or liver fat, or in logistic regression of MASLD, on the MIND adherence score, adjusted for potential confounders. ResultsHigher diet quality was associated with lower ectopic adiposity: 12% less visceral fat area, 23% less liver fat, and a 49% less likelihood of having MASLD, comparing the highest to the lowest quartile of the MIND score. Using a distance-based global test, we confirmed overall significant microbial mediation of the inverse diet-ectopic fat association. From HDMA, four bacterial genera were identified as mediating the protective association with visceral fat, with the largest mediation conferred by Lachnospiraceae UCG.001 (12.2%). Two genera (Lachnoclostridium, Weissella) were shown to mediate the MIND association with both liver fat and MASLD. In particular, Lachnoclostridium mediated 13.6% of the liver fat association and 10.8% of the MASLD association, and Lachnospiraceae UCG.001 additionally mediated 12.1% of the liver fat association. ConclusionsOur results support the hypothesis that the gut microbiota contributes to conveying the effect of diet quality on preferred body fat distribution, e.g., involving bacteria that are known to produce short-chain fatty acids (Lachnospiraceae) or secondary bile acids (Lachnoclostridium).

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
2
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
3
Gut Microbes
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
4
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
5
Obesity
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
6
Food & Function
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
11
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 35%
2.1%
13
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
International Journal of Obesity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
16
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
17
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
18
Molecular Metabolism
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
19
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
20
Gut
36 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
21
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
22
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
23
The Journal of Nutrition
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
24
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Diabetes Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
29
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
30
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%