Back

Infodemic Management Challenges and Training Needs Among Frontline Health Educators in Lagos State Nigeria

Erim, A.; Lansana, P.; Badmus, O.; Olanrewaju, M. F.

2026-04-11 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2026.04.09.26350557 medRxiv
Show abstract

Misinformation circulating through digital platforms and community networks increasingly challenges public health communication, particularly in low-and middle-income countries. Frontline health educators play a critical role in addressing misinformation and promoting accurate health information within primary health care systems; however, empirical evidence on their preparedness to manage infodemics remains limited. This study assessed the training needs and response capacity of primary health care health educators in Lagos State, Nigeria. A convergent mixed-methods design was employed across three districts. Quantitative data were collected from 95 health educators using the 30-item Health Educators Infodemic Management Training Needs Assessment Questionnaire (HEIM-TNAQ). Qualitative data were obtained through six focus group discussions involving 56 educators and 25 key informant interviews with supervisors and programme managers. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and t-tests, while qualitative data were analysed thematically. Participants demonstrated relatively strong knowledge of health misinformation (mean = 71.5), but only moderate decision-response skills (48.6) and low confidence in addressing misinformation (42.5). Integration of misinformation response into routine practice was also limited (46.3), and no significant differences were observed between respondents with or without prior training. Qualitative findings revealed frequent exposure to vaccine rumours, spiritual explanations for illness, and misinformation circulating through social media and community networks. Strengthening infodemic management within primary health care requires practical training, behavioural communication skills, and institutional mechanisms for systematic rumour monitoring and response.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.