Infodemic Management Challenges and Training Needs Among Frontline Health Educators in Lagos State Nigeria
Erim, A.; Lansana, P.; Badmus, O.; Olanrewaju, M. F.
Show abstract
Misinformation circulating through digital platforms and community networks increasingly challenges public health communication, particularly in low-and middle-income countries. Frontline health educators play a critical role in addressing misinformation and promoting accurate health information within primary health care systems; however, empirical evidence on their preparedness to manage infodemics remains limited. This study assessed the training needs and response capacity of primary health care health educators in Lagos State, Nigeria. A convergent mixed-methods design was employed across three districts. Quantitative data were collected from 95 health educators using the 30-item Health Educators Infodemic Management Training Needs Assessment Questionnaire (HEIM-TNAQ). Qualitative data were obtained through six focus group discussions involving 56 educators and 25 key informant interviews with supervisors and programme managers. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and t-tests, while qualitative data were analysed thematically. Participants demonstrated relatively strong knowledge of health misinformation (mean = 71.5), but only moderate decision-response skills (48.6) and low confidence in addressing misinformation (42.5). Integration of misinformation response into routine practice was also limited (46.3), and no significant differences were observed between respondents with or without prior training. Qualitative findings revealed frequent exposure to vaccine rumours, spiritual explanations for illness, and misinformation circulating through social media and community networks. Strengthening infodemic management within primary health care requires practical training, behavioural communication skills, and institutional mechanisms for systematic rumour monitoring and response.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Key topics in pandemic health risk communication: A qualitative study of expert opinions and knowledge 95%
- Process of Use of Evidence Products by Frontline Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Staff at the Facility Level in Ghana. 95%
- Global Learning Opportunities Within Social Innovation in Health (GLOWS): Modified Delphi Process to Identify and Pilot Core Competencies for Learning 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Navigating vaccination choices: The intersecting dynamics of institutional trust, belonging and message perception among Congolese migrants in the UK (A reflexive thematic analysis) 95%
- Implementation research for advancing health equity: design and competency-based assessment of a short-term implementation research training program focused on health equity in global health 95%
- The cascading impacts of attacks on health in Syria: A qualitative study of health system and community impacts 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- How can rural community-engaged health services planning affect sustainable health care system changes? - A process description and qualitative analysis of data from the Rural Coordination Centre of British Columbia’s Rural Site Visits Project 95%
- Challenges and facilitators in pathways to cancer diagnosis in Southern Africa: A qualitative study 94%
- A cross-sectional study of COVID-19 knowledge, beliefs and prevention behaviors among adults in Senegal 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of Generative AI for Health Among Urban Youth in Pakistan: A Mixed-Methods Study 93%
- Developing contents for a digital drug adherence tool with reminder cues and personalized feedback: a formative mixed-methods study among children and adolescents living with HIV in Tanzania 93%
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.