Back

Spatial Decomposition of Longitudinal RNFL Maps Reveals Distinct Modes of Glaucomatous Progression with Structure Function and Genetic Signatures

Chen, L.; Zhao, Y.; Moradi, M.; Eslami, M.; Wang, M.; Elze, T.; Zebardast, N.

2026-04-11 health informatics
10.64898/2026.04.09.26350387 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeTo determine whether spatial decomposition of longitudinal retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) change maps reveals distinct modes of glaucomatous progression masked by conventional averaging, and to validate these modes through structure-function mapping and genetic association analysis. MethodsPixel-wise RNFL rates of change were computed from longitudinal optic disc OCT scans of 15,242 eyes (8,419 adults with primary open-angle glaucoma [POAG]; Massachusetts Eye and Ear, 1998-2023). A loss-only constraint zeroed all thickening values, reflecting the biological prior that adult RNFL does not regenerate. Non-negative matrix factorization decomposed these maps into spatial progression components (80% training set). Components were evaluated in a held-out set (20%) for retinotopic structure-function concordance, visual field (VF) progressor classification against global and quadrant RNFL rates, and enrichment of genetic association signals at established POAG loci. ResultsSix anatomically distinct progression patterns emerged, including diffuse circumferential loss, focal peripapillary defects, and arcuate bundle degeneration. Pattern-based models significantly outperformed global RNFL rate for classifying VF progressors (area under the curve, 0.750 [95% CI, 0.709-0.790] vs. 0.702; P = .0096) and explained additional variance in functional decline (Nagelkerke pseudo-R{superscript 2}, 0.301 vs. 0.198; P = .0011). Structure-function mapping confirmed retinotopic coherence. Spatial phenotypes recovered stronger genetic signals than global rates at 85.3% of established POAG loci, suggesting they capture more biologically homogeneous endophenotypes of progression. ConclusionsGlaucomatous structural progression occurs through spatially distinct modes with independent structure-function and genetic signatures that conventional RNFL averaging obscures.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Experimental Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.7%
2
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.4%
4
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.5%
5
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.0%
6
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
7
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
Translational Vision Science & Technology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
9
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
10
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.8%
11
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Ophthalmology Science
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.8%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
17
Experimental Eye Research
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
18
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
19
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
21
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
23
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
24
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.8%
25
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.7%
29
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.7%