Back

Evidence on WASH interventions in Negelle-Arsi District, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional data analysis

Teshome, W. F.; Edao, B. Y.

2026-04-08 public and global health
10.64898/2026.04.08.26349166 medRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUND: Integrated WASH interventions are essential for improving public health by increasing access to safe water, sanitation, and hygiene services. This study evaluates their impact on water access and household knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) in rural communities by comparing intervention and non-intervention areas. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in May 2025 across six kebele administrations (three intervention and three control). Data were collected from 396 households with children under five using structured questionnaires, with equal representation from both groups. Descriptive analysis was applied to compare outcomes. RESULTS: Children in intervention areas experienced significantly lower diarrhea rates (2.5% vs. 34.9%). Households also showed improved health behaviors, including higher rates of facility births (88.9% vs. 63.6%), breastfeeding (98% vs. 89.9%), and vaccination (78.8% vs. 59.1%). Access to safe water improved markedly: all intervention households used protected sources, spent less time collecting water (13.9 vs. 55.8 minutes), and consumed more water daily (20.6 vs. 10.5 liters). Safely managed water services reached 59.6% compared to just 1% in control areas. Sanitation and hygiene practices were also better, with higher latrine access (95% vs. 78.3%), reduced open defecation (23.2% vs. 52%), and increased handwashing with soap (48.5% vs. 12.1%). Knowledge, attitudes, and practices were significantly stronger in intervention communities. CONCLUSION: Integrated WASH interventions significantly improve water access, hygiene practices, and child health outcomes. Sustaining these benefits requires continued investment in infrastructure, community awareness, and behavior change programs. KEY WORDS: Water, sanitation and hygiene, KAP, rural Ethiopia

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 2%
33.3%
2
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.2%
3
PLOS Water
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
5
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
7
Malaria Journal
48 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.5%
8
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
9
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
10
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
11
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
12
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
14
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
17
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
18
Tropical Medicine & International Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
19
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
20
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
21
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
22
Acta Tropica
13 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
23
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%
24
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.5%