Back

Assessing the Impact of Timing and Coverage of United States COVID-19 Vaccination Campaigns: A Multi-Model Approach

Nande, A.; Larsen, S. L.; Turtle, J.; Davis, J. T.; Bandekar, S. R.; Lewis, B.; Chen, S.; Contamin, L.; Jung, S.-m.; Howerton, E.; Shea, K.; Bay, C.; Ben-Nun, M.; Bi, K.; Bouchnita, A.; Chen, J.; Chinazzi, M.; Fox, S. J.; Hill, A. L.; Hochheiser, H.; Lemaitre, J. C.; Loo, S. L.; Marathe, M.; Meyers, L. A.; Pearson, C. A. B.; Porebski, P.; Przykucki, E.; Smith, C. P.; Venkatramanan, S.; Vespignani, A.; Willard, T. C.; Yan, K.; Viboud, C.; Lessler, J.; Truelove, S.

2026-04-08 public and global health
10.64898/2026.04.07.26349269 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Six years after its emergence, SARS-CoV-2 continues to have a substantial burden. The impact of vaccination and the optimal timing of its rollout remain uncertain given existing population immunity and variability in outbreak timing between summer and winter. Methods The US Scenario Modeling Hub convened its 19th round of ensemble projections for COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths in the United States, where eight teams projected trajectories in each US state and nationally from April 2025 to April 2026 under five scenarios regarding vaccine recommendations and timing. Recommendations had two eligibility scenarios (high-risk individuals only and all-eligible) and two timing scenarios (classic start: mid-August, earlier start: late June). These were crossed to create four scenarios and were compared against a counterfactual scenario with no vaccination. Findings Compared to no vaccination, our ensemble projections estimated 90,000 (95% PI 53,000-126,000) hospitalizations averted in the high-risk and classic timing scenario across the US. Expanding to all-eligible age-groups averted an additional 26,000 (95% PI 14,000-39,000) hospitalizations, which when coupled with the early vaccination timing, was projected to further reduce national hospitalizations by 15,000 (95% PI -3,000-33,000). The majority of teams projected both summer and winter waves. Implications We project COVID-19 will cause significant hospitalizations and deaths in the US in the 2025-26 season and estimate significant benefits from a broad all-eligible vaccination recommendation. The results also suggest an additional benefit is likely to be gained from an earlier vaccination campaign. Funding Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Institute of Health (US), National Science Foundation (US)

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.5%
2
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
3
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.5%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.4%
5
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
7
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
8
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
9
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
10
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
11
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.7%
13
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
14
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
15
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
16
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 69%
1.0%
19
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.9%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 53%
0.9%
22
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
24
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
27
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
23 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
28
Medical Decision Making
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%