Back

Acceptability of an intervention to improve uptake of evidence-based emergency myocardial infarction care in Tanzania: A qualitative study

Sumner, S. F.; Sakita, F. M.; Haukila, K. F.; Wanda, L.; Kweka, G. L.; Mlangi, J. J.; Shayo, P.; Tarimo, T. G.; Khanna, S.; Wang, C.; Pyne, A.; Manavalan, P.; Thielman, N. M.; Bettger, J. P.; Hertz, J. T.

2026-04-11 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2026.04.07.26348549 medRxiv
Show abstract

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is an increasing cause of morbidity and mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) but is often underdiagnosed and undertreated. To address this gap, the Multicomponent Intervention to Improve Myocardial Infarction Care (MIMIC) was developed and implemented in the emergency department (ED) of a regional referral center in northern Tanzania. We conducted in-depth interviews with 20 key stakeholders (physicians, nurses, administrators, and patients) who participated in MIMIC during the first year of implementation. Purposive sampling was used to recruit a broad range of participants. Interviews were guided by a semi-structured interview guide informed by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA). Interview transcripts were thematically analyzed by a team of coders using an inductive, grounded theory approach guided by the seven TFA domains. Nineteen major themes emerged across all TFA domains. Overall, participants described MIMIC as highly acceptable, minimally burdensome, and well-aligned with professional and ethical values. Perceived effectiveness was most emphasized, with staff citing improvements in AMI recognition, ECG and troponin testing, and use of evidence-based therapies. All components were highlighted as effective and easily integrated into existing workflows. Patients valued the educational pamphlet for improving knowledge and self-efficacy, though staff expressed concerns about distributing it during acute care, contributing to inconsistent delivery. Champions were viewed as key in promoting adherence and sustaining implementation of the intervention. MIMIC was widely acceptable in all seven TFA domains among ED providers and patients, with perceived effectiveness driving positive attitudes across stakeholder groups. Use of a co-design approach in MIMIC development likely contributed to high intervention acceptability. Patient education strategies may require adaptation to improve fidelity. These findings suggest that continued implementation and future adaptation of MIMIC may be feasible.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.3%
2
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
14.2%
3
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
4
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.8%
6
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.9%
7
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
8
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
9
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
10
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
11
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.5%
12
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
13
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
14
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
15
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
16
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
17
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
18
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
22
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
23
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
25
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
26
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%