Back

A feasibility study on combining Ayurvedic dietary knowledge and modern nutrition to personalise diets for cancer patients

Velarsan, S.; Agarwal, S.; N, B.; Shankar, P.; Megha,

2026-04-08 oncology
10.64898/2026.04.06.26350237 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) guidelines on nutrition for cancer patients provides evidence based dietary recommendations that is routinely deployed by dieticians in oncology settings. Although these can be culturally adapted, they do not adequately address inter individual variability in treatment related gastrointestinal symptoms and appetite, issues that increase malnutrition risk in cancer patients. Ayurveda, on the other hand, lacks nutrient based guidelines but offers a well grounded dietary framework to assess digestive function and personalise diets. This study investigated the feasibility of combining the two approaches in a clinical setting. Methods: Consenting adult cancer patients diagnosed with any type and stage of cancer were recruited. At baseline, digestive strength, dietary intake, quality and frequency and Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PGSGA) score were recorded. Based on this, personalised meal plans (MPs) that combine nutrient guidelines from ESPEN and traditional food concepts to support digestive strength were provided to participants. Follow ups ranged from 4 weeks to 6 months, at which digestive strength and PGSGA was noted. To evaluate against a benchmark, meal plans were theoretically constructed using Ayurveda concepts (traditional MP) or ESPEN guidelines (Standard MP) alone. Results: Data is presented for 33 participants, of which 52% had weak digestive strength. Baseline intake averaged 879 kcal/day, well below the recommended 1400 to 1600 kcal/ day level. Traditional MPs improved energy intake but were protein insufficient, aspects that were addressed in the standard MPs. Diet quantity (1417 kcal/day), quality and frequency improved on the integrated MP, with 3 patients achieving optimal digestive strength. Personalised counselling reduced malnutrition risk, as reported by PGSGA score. Conclusion: Customising dietary advice by overlaying nutrient guidelines with Ayurveda dietary concepts is feasible. The evaluation of digestive strength holds promise for personalising nutrition therapy. Trial Registration: CTRI/2023/07/055657

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.4%
2
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
3
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
4
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
5
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.0%
7
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
9
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
10
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
11
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
13
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
14
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
15
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
16
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
20
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
26
Appetite
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
27
FEBS Open Bio
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
28
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
29
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%