Back

The Gut-Vascular Axis in Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Human Microbiome Evidence

Fahim, F.; Hemmati, M.; Heshmaty, S.; Sharvirani, A.; Shahini, A.; Hosseini, A.; Hosseini Marvast, S. M.; Mojtahedzadeh, A.; Konarizadeh, M.; Dorisefat, F.; Maham, N.; Omranisarduiyeh, A.; Oveisi, S.; Fadaei Juibari, F.; Malekipour Kashan, B.; Sharifi, G.; Zali, A.

2026-04-07 neurology
10.64898/2026.04.05.26350207 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Intracranial aneurysm rupture is the leading cause of spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage and is associated with substantial mortality and long term neurological disability. Emerging evidence suggests that the gut microbiome may influence vascular inflammation and endothelial integrity through immune and metabolic pathways, yet human evidence linking gut microbial alterations to intracranial aneurysm remains fragmented and inconsistent. Objective This systematic review and meta analysis aimed to synthesize available human evidence on the association between gut microbiome alterations and intracranial aneurysm formation or rupture, with a primary focus on microbial dysbiosis and differences in gut microbial alpha diversity. Methods This study was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines and the protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261360785). A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL was performed from database inception until April 1, 2026, with additional screening of grey literature sources. Observational human studies evaluating gut microbiome characteristics in patients with intracranial aneurysm were included. Mendelian randomization (MR) studies investigating genetically predicted microbial taxa and aneurysm outcomes were also reviewed. Random effects meta analysis using standardized mean differences (SMD) was performed for alpha diversity outcomes. MR taxa reported in at least two independent studies were quantitatively synthesized using inverse variance weighting of log odds ratios. Results The systematic search identified 396 records. After removal of duplicates and eligibility screening, 20 studies met inclusion criteria, including 12 observational clinical studies and 8 Mendelian randomization analyses. Meta analysis of three microbiome sequencing studies demonstrated significantly reduced gut microbial alpha diversity in patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms compared with controls. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of pooled estimates. In addition, MR evidence identified several microbial taxa, including Ruminococcus1, Bilophila, Fusicatenibacter, and Porphyromonadaceae, as potentially protective factors against aneurysm related outcomes. Across observational studies, gut dysbiosis was frequently associated with inflammatory pathways and alterations in microbial metabolites implicated in vascular dysfunction. Conclusion Current human evidence suggests a potential association between gut microbiome dysbiosis and intracranial aneurysm pathophysiology, particularly in relation to aneurysm rupture. Reduced microbial diversity and specific microbial taxa may influence vascular inflammation and aneurysm wall stability. However, existing evidence remains limited and heterogeneous. Large prospective cohorts and mechanistic studies are required to clarify causal relationships and evaluate whether microbiome targeted interventions could contribute to aneurysm risk stratification or prevention strategies.

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
9.5%
2
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.5%
3
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
4
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.5%
5
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.7%
7
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
8
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
9
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
10
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
12
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
14
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
15
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.0%
17
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
18
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
19
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.3%
21
Brain, Behavior, & Immunity - Health
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
22
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
23
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
24
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
26
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
27
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
Epigenetics
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
29
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
30
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%