Efficacy, safety and dose response of STS01, a topical controlled release nanoparticle formulation (dithranol/Prosilic), in adults with mild to moderate patchy alopecia areata: A randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 2 trial

Background There are no licensed treatments for patients with mild to moderate patchy alopecia areata (AA). Objectives To evaluate the efficacy, safety and dose response of STS01, a novel nanoparticle controlled release, topical formulation of dithranol/Prosilic. Methods In a phase 2, double blind study, adult patients with mild to moderate AA (guideline 10% to 50% of scalp hair loss) were randomly assigned to STS01 at doses of 0.25%, 0.5%, 1%, 2% or placebo, daily for 6 months. The primary endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving a >=30% improvement in Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score, and percentage change from baseline in SALT score. This minimum level of improvement is generally accepted as an indicator of the population likely to progress to complete regrowth Results A total of 155 patients were randomized and treated (placebo, n=32; STS01 groups, n=30 to 31). STS01 1% met the primary efficacy endpoint of >=30% SALT score improvement compared to placebo: 75.9% (95% CI, 60.3 to 91.4%) vs 36.7% (95% CI, 19.4 to 53.9%) at 6 months; p=0.0037. The least squares (LS) mean percentage change in SALT score from baseline to end of treatment showed a clear dose response relationship; STS01 0.5% was the minimally effective dose and 2% the maximum tolerated dose, and there was a statistically significant improvement in the STS01 1% group (minus 55.0% vs +0.6% with placebo; p<0.01). Significant improvements (p<0.05) in LS mean percentage changes from baseline in SALT scores were demonstrated in the STS01 1% group at 2 months (-28.6% vs 12.8%), 4 months (-57.2% vs 1.5%), and 6 months (minus 67.0% vs 0.6%). Clinical Global Impression improvement was reported in 72.0% of patients with STS01 1% vs 41.7% with placebo (p<0.05). The most commonly reported treatment emergent adverse events were skin irritation reactions, but were mostly mild (STS01: 56.7% to 71.0%; placebo: 21.9%) or moderate (STS01:13.3% to 35.5%; placebo: 0%) and manageable by reduced frequency of application. There were 15 skin-related discontinuations with STS01 (12.2%) and 2 (6.3%) with placebo. Conclusions STS01 demonstrated a clear dose response, with STS01 1% dose optimally more effective than placebo for hair regrowth with minimal tolerance concerns in mild to moderate patchy AA. Skin irritation reactions were generally manageable and there were no new safety signals. Further characterisation of the STS01 1% dose is planned in a phase 3 study. Chief Investigator AGM reports fees from Soterios Ltd. Chief Statistician DMF is an employee of Soterios Ltd. All other authors were Principal Investigators in the trial and their clinics were reimbursed for the work involved. Most also had sponsorship in the form of consultancies, investigational roles or lecturing roles on behalf of other Dermatological pharmaceutical companies