Back

Causes and consequences of unawareness (anosognosia) of tool-action errors after left-hemisphere stroke

Thibault, S.; Williamson, R.; Wong, A. L.; Buxbaum, L. J.

2026-04-02 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.03.31.715610 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Many individuals with limb apraxia after left-hemisphere stroke exhibit a lack of awareness of their tool-related action errors, i.e., unawareness of apraxia (UA; also called anosognosia of apraxia). Little is known about the prevalence of UA, the relationship between UA and apraxia severity, or its underlying mechanisms. Here, we assessed both the causes and consequences of UA. Based on a mechanistic model, we hypothesized that UA may arise because of deficits in representations signaling how tool-related movements should look and feel--a component of action knowledge--and that degradation of this knowledge impedes the detection of mismatches between planned and actual tool-related actions. We further predicted that a consequence of UA is a reduction in error-correction attempts. Fifty-six individuals with chronic LCVA gestured to show how to use tools. Immediately after the gesture production task, participants were asked if they made any errors. All participants also completed an action knowledge task to measure the integrity of tool-related movement goals. Individuals were denoted as exhibiting UA if they performed below a normative cutoff for apraxia yet reported making no errors. Our sample included 21 individuals with apraxia; of these, nearly half (48%) exhibited UA. These two groups made a comparable number of gesture errors and were of equivalent stroke severity, yet individuals with UA had significantly more impaired action knowledge. Additionally, individuals with UA were less likely to attempt to correct their errors compared to individuals who were aware of their apraxia. These data support the hypothesis that action knowledge (how tool actions look and feel) serves a key role in error detection and awareness of apraxia and may contribute to the difficulties with everyday tasks experienced by many people with apraxia.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.6%
2
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
3
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.9%
4
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
5
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.4%
7
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
9
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
10
The Cerebellum
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
11
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.9%
13
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 26%
2.4%
15
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
16
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.9%
17
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
18
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.5%
19
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.8%
22
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
23
Experimental Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
26
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.6%
27
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
28
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
29
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.5%