Self-Reported Symptoms Enable Four-Phase Menstrual Cycle Classification with Hormonally Validated Labels
Specht, B.; Tayeb, Z. Z.; Garbaya, S.; Khadraoui, D.; EL-Khozondar, M.; Schneider, R.
Show abstract
Accurate inference of physiological state across the menstrual cycle has important applications in reproductive health and in understanding symptom dynamics, yet most non-hormonal approaches rely on wearable sensors or calendar-based tracking. Whether self-reported symptoms alone can support prospective, cross-subject phase classification remains unresolved. Here, we introduce a hybrid modelling framework that combines a gradient-boosted classifier with a Hidden Semi-Markov Model to infer four menstrual cycle phases (menstrual, follicular, fertile, and luteal) from self-reported data. The classifier captures non-linear symptom patterns, while the temporal model imposes biologically grounded constraints, including cyclic ordering and realistic phase durations. In a leave-one-subject-out evaluation using hormonally annotated data from 41 participants, the model achieved 67.6\% accuracy and a macro F1 score of 0.662. Features reflecting short-term symptom variability were more informative than absolute symptom levels, indicating that within-person fluctuation provides a more generalisable signal of cycle phase than symptom intensity alone. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of low-burden, device-free menstrual health monitoring, establish symptom dynamics as a basis for scalable digital biomarkers, and expand access to tracking in resource-constrained settings and populations underserved by wearable-based approaches.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The menstrual cycle through the lens of a wearable device: insights into physiology, sleep, and cycle variability 93%
- Assessment of Menstrual Health Status and Evolution through Mobile Apps for Fertility Awareness 93%
- Passive Detection of COVID-19 with Wearable Sensors and Explainable Machine Learning Algorithms 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Feasibility of Continuous Distal Body Temperature for Passive, Early Pregnancy Detection 93%
- Modular Clinical Decision Support Networks (MoDN)—Updatable, Interpretable, and Portable Predictions for Evolving Clinical Environments 91%
- Assessing generalizability of an AI-based visual test for cervical cancer screening 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Labeling self-tracked menstrual health records with hidden semi-Markov models 96%
- A Transformer-Based Model Trained on Large Scale Claims Data for Prediction of Severe COVID-19 Disease Progression 90%
- Evaluating Explanations from AI Algorithms for Clinical Decision-Making: A Social Science-based Approach 89%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting preterm births from electrohysterogram recordings via deep learning 93%
- Subtyping of common complex diseases and disorders by integrating heterogeneous data. Identifying clusters among women with lower urinary tract symptoms in the LURN study 92%
- Rett syndrome severity estimation with the BioStamp nPoint using interactions between heart rate variability and body movement 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.