Back

Functionally convergent but parametrically distinct solutions: Robust degeneracy in a population of computational models of early-birth rat CA1 pyramidal neurons

Tomko, M.; Lupascu, C. A.; Filipova, A.; Jedlicka, P.; Lacinova, L.; Migliore, M.

2026-04-01 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.03.30.715207 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundFlexibility and robustness of neuronal function are closely linked to degeneracy, the ability of distinct structural or parametric configurations to produce similar functional outcomes. At the cellular level, this often manifests as ion-channel degeneracy, in which multiple combinations of intrinsic conductances yield comparable electrophysiological phenotypes. MethodologyWe used a population-based, data-driven modelling framework to generate large ensembles of biophysically detailed CA1 pyramidal neuron models constrained by somatic electrophysiological features extracted from patch-clamp recordings in acute slices from early-birth rats. 10 reconstructed morphologies were incorporated, and model populations were analyzed using parameter correlation analysis, principal component analysis, and generalization tests to assess robustness, degeneracy, and morphology dependence of intrinsic properties. ConclusionsAcross the model population, similar somatic firing behaviours emerged from widely different combinations of intrinsic parameters, demonstrating robust two-level ion channel degeneracy both within and across morphologies. Each morphology occupied a distinct region of parameter space, indicating morphology-specific compensatory effects, while weak pairwise parameter correlations suggested distributed compensation rather than tight parameter dependencies. Even with a fixed morphology, multiple parameter subspaces supported comparable electrophysiological phenotypes. Generalization across morphologies was structure-dependent and non-reciprocal, with successful parameter similarity occurring preferentially between structurally similar neurons. Interestingly, to accurately simulate spike-frequency adaptation, it was important to retain some kinetic properties of the ion channel models as free parameters during optimization. Together, these findings show that dendrite morphology shapes the valid parameter space, and similar electrophysiology of CA1 pyramidal neurons arises from the interplay between structural variability and ion-channel diversity. This work highlights the importance of population-based modelling for capturing biological variability and provides insights into how neuronal robustness might be maintained despite substantial heterogeneity, and offers a scalable pipeline for generating biophysically realistic CA1 neuron populations for use in network simulations. Author summaryNeurons must reliably process information even though their internal components, such as ion channels and cellular shape, can vary widely from cell to cell. How stable behaviour emerges from such variability is a fundamental question in neuroscience. In this study, we explored this problem using detailed computer models of early-birth rat hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons, a cell type that plays a central role in learning and memory. Instead of building a single "average" neuron model, we created large populations of models that all reproduced key experimental recordings but differed in their internal parameters. We found that neurons with different shapes and different combinations of ion channels could nevertheless generate similar electrical activity. This phenomenon, known as ion channel degeneracy, allows neurons to remain functional despite biological variability or perturbations. Our results show that neuronal shape strongly influences which parameter combinations are viable, but that multiple solutions exist even for the same morphology. The population of models we provide offers a resource for future studies of early-birth CA1 pyramidal cell function and dysfunction.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
27.9%
2
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
3
Hippocampus
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
5
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
6
Neural Computation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
8
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.5%
9
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
10
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
11
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
79 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
16
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
18
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
19
Brain Structure and Function
83 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
20
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
21
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
24
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
28
Cognitive Neurodynamics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
29
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.6%