Back

Data-driven subtypes of type 2 diabetes mellitus and risk of dementia, stroke, and brain structural changes in the UK Biobank

Han, S.; Zhou, Y.; Sturkenboom, M. C.; Biessels, G. J.; Ahmadizar, F.

2026-03-31 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.03.30.26349725 medRxiv
Show abstract

Aims Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) increases risks of stroke and dementia, yet these risks vary across individuals. We hypothesized that clinically derived diabetes subtypes contribute to this heterogeneity. We aimed to identify data-driven subtypes using routine clinical features and examine their associations with dementia, stroke, mortality, and brain structure. Methods K-means clustering was applied to 14,353 UK Biobank participants with prevalent T2DM using age at diagnosis, body mass index, glycated hemoglobin, insulin resistance (triglyceride/HDL ratio), systolic blood pressure, and C-reactive protein. Cox models assessed associations with incident dementia (all-cause, Alzheimers disease [AD], vascular dementia [VaD]), stroke (all-cause, ischemic [IS], intracerebral hemorrhage [ICH]), and mortality. Brain MRI outcomes were analyzed in 779 participants using inverse probability-weighted linear regression. Results Three subtypes were identified: severe obesity-related inflammatory diabetes (SOID), mild metabolic diabetes (MMD, reference), and mild age-related hypertension-predominant diabetes (MARD-H). Compared with MMD, SOID showed higher risks of dementia (HR 1.24), VaD (HR 1.42), stroke (HR 1.38), IS (HR 1.48), all-cause mortality (HR 1.59), and cardiovascular death (HR 1.88). MRI showed lower gray matter volume and greater white matter hyperintensity burden in SOID. Conclusions Data-driven subtyping revealed heterogeneity in neurological risk in T2DM, with the obesity-inflammation subtype showing elevated vascular and neuroimaging risk.

Published in Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (predicted rank #8) · training set

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.