Back

Barcode Crosstalk in ONT Multiplex Sequencing: Quantification and Mitigation Strategies

Scharf, S. A.; Spohr, P.; Ried, M. J.; Haas, R.; Klau, G. W.; Henrich, B.; Pfeffer, K.

2026-03-28 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.03.27.714689 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Multiplexing samples in long-read sequencing with Oxford Nanopore Next Generation Sequencing Technology (ONT) by ligating specific native barcodes to individual DNA samples enables significant increases of high throughput sequencing combined with a significant reduction of sequencing costs. However, this advantage carries the risk of barcode misassignment / crosstalk. Employing ONT multiplex sequencing with samples, we observed misassigned barcodes so called barcode crosstalk, after ONT library preparation according to the standard protocol, particularly in samples with low input DNA concentrations. We assumed that these barcode misassignments are largely due to misligation of remaining native barcodes during subsequent the subsequent sequencing adapter ligation. To systematically investigate and quantify barcode crosstalk, genomic DNA (gDNA) from four bacterial type strains with different DNA input concentrations was prepared using three protocols for library preparation: the Nanopore standard protocol (protocol A: version valid until July 2, 2025) the new Nanopore protocol (protocol B: version from July 2, 2025), and an in house protocol with pooling of the barcoded samples only after the sequencing adapter ligation step (protocol C: in house). All samples were sequenced on a Nanopore PromethIon device. The results clearly showed that the use of protocol A resulted in a pronounced barcode crosstalk especially detectable in samples with low DNA input concentrations (up to 2.4% misassigned reads). The ONT adjustment in protocol B (altered washing buffer vs. protocol A) significantly alleviated the barcode crosstalk to below 0.01%, whereas protocol C eliminated barcode crosstalk virtually completely. These observations emphasize that sequencing results obtained with older ONT native barcoding protocol variants should be critically reviewed. The newer ONT barcoding protocol is preferable for sequencing, but it does not completely eliminate the barcode crosstalk effect. In conclusion, for low DNA input and high accuracy sequencing, protocol C is recommended.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.4%
2
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.4%
4
Talanta
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
5
BioTechniques
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
6
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
7
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.7%
8
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
9
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
10
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
11
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
12
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
13
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
16
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
18
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
19
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
21
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
22
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
Journal of Microbiological Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
24
Metabarcoding and Metagenomics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
25
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
26
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
28
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 53%
0.9%
29
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
30
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%