Back

Maternal respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine perceptions amongst pregnant women and mothers of infants and toddlers in England: a qualitative study

Bell, S. L.; Chantler, T.; Passanante, A.; Pryce, J.; Bisset, K.; Letley, L.; Campbell, H.; Paterson, P.

2026-03-30 public and global health
10.64898/2026.03.27.26349494 medRxiv
Show abstract

Aim: To explore RSV knowledge and awareness, RSV vaccination perceptions and acceptability, and preferences for maternal vaccine delivery and communication amongst pregnant women and mothers of infants and toddlers in England. Methods: Between July and November 2024, semi-structured qualitative interviews were performed with 30 mothers (youngest child under 2 years), two of whom were pregnant with a subsequent child. The study was conducted as a follow-on to a UK Health Security Agency survey of attitudes towards RSV vaccination amongst pregnant and post-partum women in England. Findings: Although most mothers had heard of RSV, mothers with experience in health roles were more likely to understand the potential severity of RSV in infants. Likelihood of maternal RSV acceptance was reported as high, with most mothers considering RSV vaccination as beneficial in protecting infants. Most mothers preferred a hybrid approach to vaccine communication, with information available online (e.g. through the NHS website), via written sources (e.g. NHS produced leaflet), and through talking with midwives. For convenience, most mothers preferred the option of fitting vaccinations within the antenatal midwifery appointment schedule rather than going to general practice for a separate appointment. Conclusion: To support maternal RSV vaccination decision-making and access, women need vaccine information early in pregnancy; information provision through a range of different sources (i.e. online, paper, in-person); and vaccination delivery in a convenient location (i.e. as part of antenatal appointments).

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.0%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.9%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.7%
4
Vaccine: X
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
5
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
6
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
7
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.0%
9
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.0%
10
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
11
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
12
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
16
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
19
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
20
Public Health in Practice
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
21
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%