Back

What tools do men need to make an informed decision about germline genetic testing for prostate cancer: A qualitative and survey study

Raspin, K.; Bartlett, L.; Makin, J.; Wilson, R.; Butorac, K.; Roydhouse, J.; Dickinson, J. L.

2026-04-02 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.03.27.26349466 medRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PrCa) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in men in many countries and is the most heritable of the common cancers. Precision medicine approaches to disease management are not routinely available to most men, yet we know that germline genetic testing can help identify those at high-risk of developing advanced or lethal disease and can influence selection of therapeutics. An integral part of healthcare delivery design is the inclusion of patients/consumers in the development of frameworks for managing health interventions that are tailored to meet their needs. METHODS: In Phase I, we undertook focus group discussions with men previously diagnosed with PrCa (n=20), to determine their opinions, perceptions and expectations of germline genetic testing for PrCa. Focus groups were tape-recorded, transcribed verbatim, coded and then thematically analysed using NVivo. In Phase II, themes were then used to design and development a Precision Medicine in Prostate Cancer Information Toolkit, which was reviewed by patients (n=14), their carers/family members (n=4) and healthcare providers (n=14). RESULTS: In Phase I, knowledge about precision medicine and genetic testing was generally low. The strongest motivation for undertaking testing was to identify family members' risk levels (n=7), and the biggest concern pertained to insurance discrimination (n=5). Phase II data revealed that generally healthcare providers (n=8) found the purpose of the toolkit to be clearer than patients (n=5). Though, patients found the task of imagining the usefulness of the toolkit at the time of diagnosis or beforehand when assessing genetic risk, quite difficult. Participants highlighted that information regarding life insurance, implications for their family and costs associated with testing were of concern. CONCLUSIONS: This study has revealed critical knowledge gaps, preferred communication/support needs, and concerns/risks associated with germline genetic testing in PrCa. Concerns pertaining to family members and insurance discrimination are obvious topics that need to be addressed. Our toolkit may be helpful in addressing knowledge gaps, but further testing is needed to ensure its accessibility across literary and cultural contexts.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.0%
2
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.8%
3
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.8%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.7%
5
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.7%
6
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.2%
9
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
10
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
11
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.6%
13
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
14
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
15
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
16
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
17
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
22
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
23
Biology of Sex Differences
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
24
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
25
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
27
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
28
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%