What tools do men need to make an informed decision about germline genetic testing for prostate cancer: A qualitative and survey study
Raspin, K.; Bartlett, L.; Makin, J.; Wilson, R.; Butorac, K.; Roydhouse, J.; Dickinson, J. L.
Show abstract
BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PrCa) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in men in many countries and is the most heritable of the common cancers. Precision medicine approaches to disease management are not routinely available to most men, yet we know that germline genetic testing can help identify those at high-risk of developing advanced or lethal disease and can influence selection of therapeutics. An integral part of healthcare delivery design is the inclusion of patients/consumers in the development of frameworks for managing health interventions that are tailored to meet their needs. METHODS: In Phase I, we undertook focus group discussions with men previously diagnosed with PrCa (n=20), to determine their opinions, perceptions and expectations of germline genetic testing for PrCa. Focus groups were tape-recorded, transcribed verbatim, coded and then thematically analysed using NVivo. In Phase II, themes were then used to design and development a Precision Medicine in Prostate Cancer Information Toolkit, which was reviewed by patients (n=14), their carers/family members (n=4) and healthcare providers (n=14). RESULTS: In Phase I, knowledge about precision medicine and genetic testing was generally low. The strongest motivation for undertaking testing was to identify family members' risk levels (n=7), and the biggest concern pertained to insurance discrimination (n=5). Phase II data revealed that generally healthcare providers (n=8) found the purpose of the toolkit to be clearer than patients (n=5). Though, patients found the task of imagining the usefulness of the toolkit at the time of diagnosis or beforehand when assessing genetic risk, quite difficult. Participants highlighted that information regarding life insurance, implications for their family and costs associated with testing were of concern. CONCLUSIONS: This study has revealed critical knowledge gaps, preferred communication/support needs, and concerns/risks associated with germline genetic testing in PrCa. Concerns pertaining to family members and insurance discrimination are obvious topics that need to be addressed. Our toolkit may be helpful in addressing knowledge gaps, but further testing is needed to ensure its accessibility across literary and cultural contexts.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and evaluation of a novel educational program for providers on the use of polygenic risk scores 94%
- Using Coincidence Analysis to Identify Causal Chains of Factors Associated with Implementation and Optimization of Lynch Syndrome Tumor Screening Across Multiple Health care Systems 94%
- Systematic assessment of outcomes following a genetic diagnosis identified through a large-scale research study into developmental disorders 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors affecting COVID-19 outcomes in cancer patients - A first report from Guys Cancer Centre in London 90%
- Association of the rs1042522 SNP with prostate cancer risk: a study of cancer tissues, primary tumor cultures and serum samples from a European Caucasian population 90%
- The Impact of the UK COVID-19 Lockdown on the Screening, Diagnostics and Incidence of Breast, Colorectal, Lung and Prostate Cancer in the UK: a Population-Based Cohort Study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Qualitative Study Exploring the Consumer Experience of Receiving Self-Initiated Polygenic Risk Scores from a Third-Party Website 93%
- Defining the Critical Educational Components of Informed Consent for Genetic Testing: Views of US-Based Genetic Counselors and Medical Geneticists 92%
- Benefits and barriers to implementing precision preventive care: results of a national physician survey 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acceptability of extending HPV-based cervical screening intervals from 3 to 5 years: An interview study with women in England 94%
- Challenges and facilitators in pathways to cancer diagnosis in Southern Africa: A qualitative study 92%
- Men and sexual and reproductive healthcare in the Nordic countries: a scoping review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Feedback of Individual Genetic and Genomics Research Results: A Qualitative Study Involving Grassroots Communities in Uganda 92%
- Study Protocol: LIAM Mc Trial (Linking In with Advice and supports for Men impacted by Metastatic cancer) 92%
- Factors Influencing Precision Medicine Knowledge and Attitudes 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.